Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:35849 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 1141 invoked by uid 1010); 28 Feb 2008 14:30:38 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 1126 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2008 14:30:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Feb 2008 14:30:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=helly@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=helly@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 85.214.94.56 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: helly@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 85.214.94.56 aixcept.net Linux 2.6 Received: from [85.214.94.56] ([85.214.94.56:47864] helo=h1149922.serverkompetenz.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 48/CF-08995-D85C6C74 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:30:38 -0500 Received: from MBOERGER-ZRH (unknown [193.142.125.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by h1149922.serverkompetenz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0173911F459; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:30:34 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:30:37 +0100 Reply-To: Marcus Boerger X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <323966418.20080228153037@marcus-boerger.de> To: "Lukas Kahwe Smith" CC: "Derick Rethans" , "PHP Developers Mailing List" , "Pierre Joye" In-Reply-To: References: <0F1A0758-D3AF-4B1C-B2E0-7BEEEE1ED2C6@pooteeweet.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: documentation collaboration toolchain From: helly@php.net (Marcus Boerger) Hello Lukas, Monday, February 25, 2008, 5:04:45 PM, Pierre wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Derick Rethans wrote: >> On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: >> >> > Personally I prefer going with a wiki, because I do not have much affection >> > with CVS for these kinds of documents (actually I do think that the README's >> > should be in CVS, which is why I worked with Hannes on creating the current >> > php.net/reST interface). I have put this document up on my wiki [12], and I >> > will keep it uptodate. >> >> I'd go for RFC in CVS/Rest, and the todo's in a wiki. > Limiting the RFC to existing php.net's member sound like a bad idea > and create CVS accounts only for a RFC does not sound any better. > I would rather use the wiki for the complete process. Once a RFC > reached a "stable" status, we can add it to a RFC repository. > VC are perfect for source codes and relatively static contents but nor > for documents edition like what we need for RFC, todos or other > similar documents (no source code). We should have all such docs on a WiKi with ACLs reflecting CVS accounts and additional WiKi specific accounts. As Pierre points out correctly, having to give every newcomer for every idea a CVS Access is pretty bad. Maybe the bast way to do it is to control that by our user database. Very easy, or is this too easy? Best regards, Marcus