Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:35842
Return-Path: <php@stefan-marr.de>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 90998 invoked by uid 1010); 28 Feb 2008 07:30:52 -0000
Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net
Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 90983 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2008 07:30:52 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 28 Feb 2008 07:30:52 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=php@stefan-marr.de; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=php@stefan-marr.de; sender-id=unknown
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain stefan-marr.de from 82.96.83.42 cause and error)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: php@stefan-marr.de
X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.96.83.42 serv6.servweb.de Linux 2.4/2.6
Received: from [82.96.83.42] ([82.96.83.42:43212] helo=serv6.servweb.de)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 98/52-06693-A2366C74 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 02:30:51 -0500
Received: from [192.168.0.25] (toolslave.net [85.88.12.247])
	by serv6.servweb.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5A5F590027;
	Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:30:48 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <47C66328.10606@stefan-marr.de>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:30:48 +0100
Reply-To: php@stefan-marr.de
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Joshua Thompson <spam.goes.in.here@gmail.com>
Cc: internals@lists.php.net, Andi Gutmans <andi@zend.com>
References: <47C317F4.2080301@stefan-marr.de> <698DE66518E7CA45812BD18E807866CE01506447@us-ex1.zend.net> <36.91.14752.56226C74@pb1.pair.com>
In-Reply-To: <36.91.14752.56226C74@pb1.pair.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Redirected: By TestProxy
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] How to build a real Trait thing without exclusion and
 renaming
From: php@stefan-marr.de (Stefan Marr)

Hi,

Joshua Thompson schrieb:
> Andi Gutmans wrote:
>> The following code shows a few things:
>> - local properties which can be used in self-contained functionality.
>> The storage is guaranteed to stay internal and will not clash with the
>> aggregating class.
Yes, it is a nice to have.

>> - methods are by default hidden to the aggregating class and bound to
>> the trait (as Marcus pointed out the method name would be mangled with
>> the trait's name)
Hm, ok. It is the pessimistic counterpart to my proposal. In general, 
I'm much more optimistic and would prefer to teach developers to use 
proper naming to avoid conflicts. But if there is no other way to go, it 
is ok.

> I was working on a detailed RFC of something along these lines. I didn't 
> include the local keyword, instead I went the route of stateful traits 
> and forced the definition of which scope in the class. I also tried to 
> keep the number of keywords to 1 (`trait`).
> 
> I will keep working on it, and hopefully post it tomorrow for review.
Looking forward to read it :)

Kind Regards
Stefan