Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:35747 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 30832 invoked by uid 1010); 23 Feb 2008 11:44:19 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 30817 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2008 11:44:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Feb 2008 11:44:19 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=helly@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=helly@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 85.214.94.56 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: helly@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 85.214.94.56 aixcept.net Linux 2.6 Received: from [85.214.94.56] ([85.214.94.56:34667] helo=h1149922.serverkompetenz.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 48/8D-30812-21700C74 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 06:44:19 -0500 Received: from MBOERGER-ZRH.corp.google.com (29-156.78-83.cust.bluewin.ch [83.78.156.29]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by h1149922.serverkompetenz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB8B411CF57; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 12:44:15 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 12:43:46 +0100 Reply-To: Marcus Boerger X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1068528889.20080223124346@marcus-boerger.de> To: Andrei Zmievski CC: Matvey Arye , KOYAMA Tetsuji , In-Reply-To: <93D0D6BA-34AD-4A17-B474-91B251628EA5@gravitonic.com> References: <47B9B1B9.7060601@geminisbs.com> <93D0D6BA-34AD-4A17-B474-91B251628EA5@gravitonic.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Anonymous functions From: helly@php.net (Marcus Boerger) Hello Andrei, +1 Friday, February 22, 2008, 7:00:11 PM, you wrote: > Yes, let's re-open, I'd like to get a closure on that issue (pun > intended). > -Andrei > On Feb 18, 2008, at 8:26 AM, Matvey Arye wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I second this. Can we please re-open the discussion on anonymous >> functions as well as closures. That would be an awesome feature. >> create_function is a bit ugly semantically to be sufficient for all >> anonymous function needs. >> >> Thanks, >> Mat >> >> KOYAMA Tetsuji wrote: >>> Hi lists, >>> >>> Is this discussion stopping? >>> >>> I want this feature in PHP. Please start to talk. >>> [...] >>>> 2008/1/6, Marcus Boerger : >>>> [...] >>>>> >>>>> I like the anonymous function patch too. It is clean and simple. >>>>> Maybe you >>>>> want to start a second '[RFC] Anonymous functions' thread with >>>>> that patch. >>>>> >>>>> Can you also please add tests for both? >>>>> >>>>> marcus Best regards, Marcus