Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:35669
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain iamjochem.com from 194.109.193.121 cause and error)
Message-ID: <47BCBD01.6080101@iamjochem.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:51:29 +0100
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Campbell <jcampbell1@gmail.com>
CC: internals Mailing List <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <001c01c87264$3c01b4e0$b4051ea0$@de>	 <1203453089.24580.12.camel@localhost>	 <1615703844.20080219214224@marcus-boerger.de>	 <47BB41F1.40607@iamjochem.com> <8f0676b40802201226j74e100dta71f7d8d90364b4a@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <8f0676b40802201226j74e100dta71f7d8d90364b4a@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: Traits for PHP
From: jochem@iamjochem.com (Jochem Maas)

John Campbell schreef:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Jochem Maas <jochem@iamjochem.com> wrote:
>> how about 'possesses' or 'exhibits' - both these words are closer to the
>> natural language usage of 'trait' with regard to a subject.
>>
>> John exhibits a **** trait
>> Jack possesses a **** trait
>>
>> a person coming accross 'use' or 'include' in the context of
>> trait attribution may either make assumptions or become confused as to
>> possible changes/additions to the use and/or include functionality, a
>> new keyword that aptly describes the intention will more likely force
>> users to actually find out what it means.
> 
> IMO, the keyword should be a verb because the code is instructing the
> class to add a behavior.  "possesses" and "exhibits" are adjectives
> which doesn't make much sense.  My vote would be something like
> "acquire".

that's a good point - someone else mentioned 'consumes' which also seems
to fit quite nicely.

my main point was to use a different keyword to either 'use' or 'include'
to avoid misconception, assumptions and basically get anyone not familiar
with the syntax to actually RTFM (I'd probably be guilty of glossing
over it, if I saw 'include' myself ... ;-)

personally I like 'exhibits' ... it sounds right, to me. I don't agree with
the argument that non english speaking users would have problems with such a
word any more than most other keywords already in use (e.g. 'implements') ...
although the spelling of 'possesses' could indeed be rather annoying :-)

> 
> Regards,
> John Campbell
>