Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:35607
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain strojny.net designates 85.10.204.248 as permitted sender)
To: Marcus Boerger <helly@php.net>
Cc: php@stefan-marr.de, internals@lists.php.net,
  "'Johannes =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Schl=FCter=27?=" <johannes@php.net>,
  'Sebastian Bergmann' <sb@sebastian-bergmann.de>,
  'Alexandre Bergel' <alexandre@bergel.eu>,
  'Falko Menge' <falko.menge@hpi.uni-potsdam.de>,
  'Sara Golemon' <pollita@php.net>, derick@php.net
In-Reply-To: <173732199.20080219175837@marcus-boerger.de>
References: <001c01c87264$3c01b4e0$b4051ea0$@de>
	 <173732199.20080219175837@marcus-boerger.de>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:28:29 +0100
Message-ID: <1203452909.24580.9.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=_milch.schokokeks.org-4229-1203452910-0001-2"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: Traits for PHP
From: lars@strojny.net (Lars Strojny)

--=_milch.schokokeks.org-4229-1203452910-0001-2
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Marcus,

Am Dienstag, den 19.02.2008, 17:58 +0100 schrieb Marcus Boerger:
[...]
>   looks good to me. See more detailed thoughts in separate mail resonses.
> The biggest issue I see is finding a syntax everyone likes.

I can't agree more.

> Personally I like everything but one tiny piece, that is you do '!method'
> to ignore a method from a trait. Since renaming happens in a php array li=
ke
> style I would prefer to have that approach apply for ignoring methods as
> well. The way to do that imo is 'method=3D>false' or 'method=3D>NULL' whi=
ch both
> should be obvious to PHP programmers that heard about Traits.

The irritating thing is that currently it would be null =3D> 'oldmethod'.
This is what I would critisize in general. I would prefer
'oldMethodName' =3D> 'newMethodName' instead. 'oldMethodName' =3D> null
would be really cool.

> Other than that I'd even appriciate it, if we could get this for 5.3.
> I mean come on guys it is ready and a very nice solution to the code
> reuse problem.
[...]
This would be a killer feature for 5.3! How realistic is it to get this
in?
[...]

cu, Lars

--=_milch.schokokeks.org-4229-1203452910-0001-2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (GNU/Linux)
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=ipmD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=_milch.schokokeks.org-4229-1203452910-0001-2--