Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:35606
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 64.233.184.224 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth;
        b=rbsD/X1zYDuTqkiGWp9KgiWY5qpWCP+Sy0qwuSpXw70lsRdoyoDnH7I0w+95YNNF3D3B8FEO37+TsDJmUP48Anp6QKG+tRBYkC/81adgcc/OMcrwv71pNBJgBIq407lS3ryc3Ceyvv9OPGSp05C5bkS5GRTsVBSRwHtuqjzk4Xw=
Message-ID: <b5f7bf6c0802191134h3bdae25cu2c911b87e6de0acb@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:34:25 -0500
Sender: david.coallier@gmail.com
To: "Lukas Kahwe Smith" <mls@pooteeweet.org>
Cc: "Stefan Marr" <php@stefan-marr.de>, 
	"PHP Developers Mailing List" <internals@lists.php.net>
In-Reply-To: <744ABBE0-17C0-4AB7-8BB1-E5CFC0573A7F@pooteeweet.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <744ABBE0-17C0-4AB7-8BB1-E5CFC0573A7F@pooteeweet.org>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Role model RFC
From: davidc@php.net ("David Coallier")

On Feb 19, 2008 2:09 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith <mls@pooteeweet.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I really like what Stefan did here with his traits RFC. Very solid
> work, even if there are still some people not convinced if they want
> this feature in, I have seen little complaints about the way this
> proposal was made. Quite the contrary actually. I would like this kind
> of detailed thought to become more the norm. Even if at the very
> beginning of an idea this quality may not be immediately attainable,
> it should be the goal. So for every idea we should have at least
> someone who tries to bring the proposal to this kind of level as the
> discussions progress.

Most definitely, thanks to Stefan for this. I have rarely seen such
RFC in PHP lately. This is.. wow, from simple example to a bit more
complex and real life examples, simple texts, the reason why we need
this and a bit more about MI.

The external links to further readings on the subject are great and
the thesis is even better (A bit long but very interesting).

I think this can make a lot of good to PHP's RFC process if handled
correctly. Let's just hope we do it correctly :)

>
> For this proposal I would hope that it would be put on some host we
> can trust to not disappear and be updated with the feedback. I am
> still dreaming of a php.net wiki for this kind of stuff. If interested
> I do of course offer wiki.pooteeweet.org to host these RFC's for the
> time being. Using php.net/reST has the draw back of requiring
> cvs.php.net karma for maintenance, which would be problematic for new
> comers, unless we can do karma on a per file level for this?

Wiki is such a great idea, what were the (political?) reasons for not
having it ? No one to maintain it ?

>
> regards,
> Lukas
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>



-- 
David,
Re-read what you are replying.