Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:35605
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.198.187 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=OdonEuFC9ayH3kdm/ExVYOpZRXdkVLDrueSlXs/JhLNdznOz3ucNveq3Z8fJFCvoZAGy6qSNW9AiZ/zFLLYcRwRSYwYEoTHGnv83aSFvhiKDBcqXeQG7t5COBKCPjzjZAVU/ekRknklo3KXZt7lm351aM2HfGANRJ31b8yaFoOc=
Message-ID: <ab5568160802191125x44e1171bgee4377abb4ae66bd@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:25:21 -0500
To: "Lukas Kahwe Smith" <mls@pooteeweet.org>
Cc: "Stefan Marr" <php@stefan-marr.de>, 
	"PHP Developers Mailing List" <internals@lists.php.net>
In-Reply-To: <744ABBE0-17C0-4AB7-8BB1-E5CFC0573A7F@pooteeweet.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <744ABBE0-17C0-4AB7-8BB1-E5CFC0573A7F@pooteeweet.org>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Role model RFC
From: parasane@gmail.com ("Daniel Brown")

On Feb 19, 2008 2:09 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith <mls@pooteeweet.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I really like what Stefan did here with his traits RFC. Very solid
> work, even if there are still some people not convinced if they want
> this feature in, I have seen little complaints about the way this
> proposal was made. Quite the contrary actually. I would like this kind
> of detailed thought to become more the norm. Even if at the very
> beginning of an idea this quality may not be immediately attainable,
> it should be the goal. So for every idea we should have at least
> someone who tries to bring the proposal to this kind of level as the
> discussions progress.
>
> For this proposal I would hope that it would be put on some host we
> can trust to not disappear and be updated with the feedback. I am
> still dreaming of a php.net wiki for this kind of stuff. If interested
> I do of course offer wiki.pooteeweet.org to host these RFC's for the
> time being. Using php.net/reST has the draw back of requiring
> cvs.php.net karma for maintenance, which would be problematic for new
> comers, unless we can do karma on a per file level for this?

    I'd certainly be a +1 for a wide-open Wiki on php.net for this and
similar activities.  It's been mentioned for quite some time, and it
seems as though - despite the fact that PHP drives the most popular
Wiki software - we're the last to adopt it.  In any case, keeping it
open means that ALL people involved and with more than just a passing
interest can get involved in the C part of the RFC.

    If it goes through, feel free to count me in as a volunteer to
moderate submissions, vandalism, and such.

-- 
</Dan>

Daniel P. Brown
Senior Unix Geek
<? while(1) { $me = $mind--; sleep(86400); } ?>