Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:35507 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 71587 invoked by uid 1010); 15 Feb 2008 06:41:42 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 71571 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2008 06:41:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 15 Feb 2008 06:41:42 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lars@strojny.net; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lars@strojny.net; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain strojny.net designates 85.10.204.248 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lars@strojny.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 85.10.204.248 milch.schokokeks.org Received: from [85.10.204.248] ([85.10.204.248:44581] helo=milch.schokokeks.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id CA/82-21909-12435B74 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 01:41:38 -0500 Received: from [192.168.0.8] (xdsl-87-79-226-150.netcologne.de [::ffff:87.79.226.150]) (AUTH: PLAIN lars@schokokeks.org, SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,CAMELLIA256-SHA) by milch.schokokeks.org with esmtp; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 07:41:34 +0100 id 0000000000020007.0000000047B5341E.000017B9 To: PHP Internals List In-Reply-To: <1202917630.25345.6.camel@localhost> References: <1202917630.25345.6.camel@localhost> Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:30:08 +0100 Message-ID: <1202995808.5141.4.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution 2.21.5 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] prepend_include_path()/append_include_path() From: lars@strojny.net (Lars Strojny) Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 13.02.2008, 16:47 +0100 schrieb Lars Strojny: [...] > The current patch is in a bit hacky state, as I have my doubts whether > storing the include paths as a string is a good idea. I want to gain > some feedback for this addition first before I invest more work on it. Just for the record, there is an improved version of this patch. It returns now false if snprintf() could not format the string properly. See http://lars.schokokeks.org/php/include_path_modifiers-2.diff for details. However I have the feeling that actually only a few see this patch as an improvement, so I we are not going to add this anyway. cu, Lars