Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:35489 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 52001 invoked by uid 1010); 14 Feb 2008 09:34:11 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 51986 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2008 09:34:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Feb 2008 09:34:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=markus@fischer.name; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=markus@fischer.name; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain fischer.name from 62.179.121.50 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: markus@fischer.name X-Host-Fingerprint: 62.179.121.50 viefep32-int.chello.at Solaris 10 (beta) Received: from [62.179.121.50] ([62.179.121.50:39749] helo=viefep32-int.chello.at) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id CE/51-43552-21B04B74 for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 04:34:11 -0500 Received: from genuine.home ([84.112.136.139]) by viefep32-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.7.08.02.02 201-2186-121-104-20070414) with ESMTP id <20080214093407.TQCF27099.viefep32-int.chello.at@genuine.home>; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:34:07 +0100 Received: from ncvielp07.home ([192.168.1.51]) by genuine.home with esmtpa (Exim 4.50) id 1JPaTO-0002Th-6z; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:33:42 +0100 Message-ID: <47B40B0F.2060502@fischer.name> Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:34:07 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lukas Kahwe Smith CC: Lars Strojny , Jochem Maas , Pierre Joye , PHP Internals List References: <1202917630.25345.6.camel@localhost> <1202943887.7717.7.camel@localhost> <47B383C1.3030303@iamjochem.com> <1202980076.7717.12.camel@localhost> <47B407CD.2060709@fischer.name> <8C948BF9-AEFE-4170-BD55-0056E67E1D17@pooteeweet.org> In-Reply-To: <8C948BF9-AEFE-4170-BD55-0056E67E1D17@pooteeweet.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 OpenPGP: id=C2272BD0; url=http://markus.fischer.name/my_public_key.txt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -43 X-Spam-Level: ---- X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "genuine.home", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: > On 14.02.2008, at 10:20, Markus Fischer wrote: >> Personally I never understood why we've set_include_path in the first >> place anyway. "ini_set('include_path', ..." does exactly the same and >> the C function does actually exactly this. > > Short history lesson: > The reason for set_include_path() is that many shared hosters disable > ini_set(), yet many libraries/apps depend on users being able to control > their include path. [...] Content analysis details: (-4.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -3.3 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts -1.1 BAYES_40 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 20 to 40% [score: 0.3567] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] prepend_include_path()/append_include_path() From: markus@fischer.name (Markus Fischer) Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: > On 14.02.2008, at 10:20, Markus Fischer wrote: >> Personally I never understood why we've set_include_path in the first >> place anyway. "ini_set('include_path', ..." does exactly the same and >> the C function does actually exactly this. > > Short history lesson: > The reason for set_include_path() is that many shared hosters disable > ini_set(), yet many libraries/apps depend on users being able to control > their include path. Fair enough. I think I feel pretty lucky that I've never had to operate in such environments ... On the other hand I feel unqualified taking a position here either then :) thanks, - Markus