Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:35443 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 90760 invoked by uid 1010); 13 Feb 2008 10:35:49 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 90742 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2008 10:35:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 13 Feb 2008 10:35:49 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=helly@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=helly@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 85.214.94.56 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: helly@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 85.214.94.56 aixcept.net Linux 2.6 Received: from [85.214.94.56] ([85.214.94.56:58418] helo=h1149922.serverkompetenz.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 58/10-24174-308C2B74 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 05:35:48 -0500 Received: from MBOERGER-ZRH.corp.google.com (187-169.79-83.cust.bluewin.ch [83.79.169.187]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by h1149922.serverkompetenz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 096B81B3694; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:35:42 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:35:12 +0100 Reply-To: Marcus Boerger X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1391663680.20080213113512@marcus-boerger.de> To: Felipe Pena CC: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <1202861045.5872.37.camel@pena> References: <1202861045.5872.37.camel@pena> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Math functions (new parameter parsing) From: helly@php.net (Marcus Boerger) Hello Felipe, nice work. The others already talked about the implications. And given what I can only chime in. Since so far people think it is a ok for 5.3 I wonder if we should not continue with moving towards the new parameter parsing API. In the end the best would be to get rid of the old one. Anyway thanks for the work. marcus Wednesday, February 13, 2008, 1:04:05 AM, you wrote: > Hi all, > I made a patch for 5_3 where all functions in ext/standard/math.c use > the new parameter parsing. (As was done in HEAD) > If anyone think it good, let me know, and then i'll commit it. > Several tests break with the patch. Hence, i'll fix them also, if > agreed. :) > -- > Regards, > Felipe Pena. Best regards, Marcus