Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:35435 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 52034 invoked by uid 1010); 13 Feb 2008 08:33:46 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 52019 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2008 08:33:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 13 Feb 2008 08:33:46 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tony@daylessday.org; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tony@daylessday.org; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain daylessday.org designates 89.208.40.236 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tony@daylessday.org X-Host-Fingerprint: 89.208.40.236 mail.daylessday.org Linux 2.6 Received: from [89.208.40.236] ([89.208.40.236:49635] helo=daylessday.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id B6/F0-42926-96BA2B74 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 03:33:46 -0500 Received: from [192.168.3.87] (unknown [212.42.62.198]) by daylessday.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C06EC6401E8; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:33:42 +0300 (MSK) Message-ID: <47B2AB5F.7020106@daylessday.org> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:33:35 +0300 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071114) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Felipe Pena CC: internals@lists.php.net References: <1202861045.5872.37.camel@pena> <1202868491.5872.53.camel@pena> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Math functions (new parameter parsing) From: tony@daylessday.org (Antony Dovgal) On 13.02.2008 05:31, David Coallier wrote: > As long as it's in 5_3 I believe there'll be no problems. I did the > same for a few string.c functions. > > As long as the behavior itself doesn't change, I'd say good work :) Agree, it's ok in 5_3. We need to convert all the functions to use new param parsing API anyway. Some more tests would not hurt though =) -- Wbr, Antony Dovgal