Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:35366 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 61176 invoked by uid 1010); 11 Feb 2008 11:20:56 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 61161 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2008 11:20:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 11 Feb 2008 11:20:56 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.198.185 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.198.185 rv-out-0910.google.com Received: from [209.85.198.185] ([209.85.198.185:47765] helo=rv-out-0910.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id CB/79-64922-F8F20B74 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 06:20:55 -0500 Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k15so3253590rvb.23 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 03:20:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=7G/hBxIyFNAz+rlEMzky/XEN8a3EDhr0THbNF/KcXMI=; b=Gd2IRNxEUvMfNXazTdFwBeLjc1CDNB9dQ4SFWAt17PrtXBE97hh7aimJwUOsMTgCMG4Uw96p6bj2R/rV0XcH9JhfnGwdTd4h6qzsaBe7FRZgn16CCRXrJw9Cn9XRDTKaGl/kN1OyVG+7dA3SI3QF7LdpTswt74B8cEL0fOHfNyo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=oDT1L6/uaMmOmxr2QP2UksX7iCZSpnEx2/V4Dd06qS4O/aKSw2PGbw/gWUZhjEctA1mVLtvxMtN3scENaScUN+D8idwWnnIzwV8e72GakG2mIMpXVkSBiE12npFXZM8chnBU6RVP6pR+V6SI4aNuFsBSdNa74fODLqWYrQkaeig= Received: by 10.141.79.12 with SMTP id g12mr10489172rvl.87.1202728842516; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 03:20:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.70.21 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 03:20:42 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 12:20:42 +0100 To: "Justin Martin" Cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <4B.DD.64922.092DFA74@pb1.pair.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4B.DD.64922.092DFA74@pb1.pair.com> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] w32api extension From: pierre.php@gmail.com ("Pierre Joye") Hi Justin, On Feb 11, 2008 5:43 AM, Justin Martin wrote: > Hello there, > > Just wondering if there is any interest in bringing w32api up to speed. > The docs say it was moved to PECL as of 5.1.0, however is this not the > case. Rumor has it that it was to be replaced by ffi, however again, > this is not the case (ffi is in alpha and probably dead). It has been moved out of php-src because the extension was not maintained. It is in PECL's cvs but has no release (still not maintained): http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/pecl/w32api/ FFI is much more powerful yes. But it has been developed independently of w32api. Cheers, -- Pierre http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org