Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:35302
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 66.249.82.235 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=xqxlnSyEKTi1xEN6oTOQItiNkdE9Kjc8RNHRZSp7n+D1nM5og8o+uAAqAJVRZqtShuQ/TZ+8tUFq65zHXQ+FL/GE/2cVGO7EeFDCL+IngKVzriufRGA/eC5xlP0Bo3831/CbuokSKaSdOsovpj8zwdElkNgb4Uf/uBAvzTvE5Ck=
Message-ID: <fe05d1540802070659t39921772tc486764130e85309@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 15:59:44 +0100
To: "Solar Designer" <solar@openwall.com>
Cc: "Dmitry Stogov" <dmitry@zend.com>, 
	"PHP Internals List" <internals@lists.php.net>
In-Reply-To: <20080207140815.GA21394@openwall.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20071209010552.GA12561@openwall.com>
	 <20080205235055.GA19309@openwall.com> <47AAD95A.8010109@zend.com>
	 <20080207112109.GA30558@openwall.com>
	 <20080207115027.GA30811@openwall.com>
	 <20080207121353.GA11906@openwall.com> <47AB05CB.8010906@zend.com>
	 <20080207135336.GA21239@openwall.com>
	 <fe05d1540802070600o4b9a5ac0odadfc385aa1a931b@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20080207140815.GA21394@openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: untie the MD4 code from MD5 & replace the MD5 code
From: pierre.php@gmail.com ("Pierre Joye")

Hi Alexander,

On Feb 7, 2008 3:08 PM, Solar Designer <solar@openwall.com> wrote:
> Hi Pierre,
>
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:00:55PM +0100, Pierre Joye wrote:
> > Nice addition but can you please try to keep on thread for the
> > discussions?  Thanks :-)
>
> Are you referring to the changing Subject?

Yes, three times in a row made me thought that it would be nice to
keep one thread to discuss this change :)

> If so, I prefer Subjects
> that reflect message content, whereas threading can, should, and usually
> does rely on Message-ID, In-Reply-To, and References headers.  If this
> mailing list has a different rule - such as to keep the Subject fixed
> even when discussion deviates - I am willing to follow it indeed...  In
> fact, this is what I did now (kept the Subject although this message is
> not on the patch anymore), even though I dislike having to do it.


No big deal but I don't see a different topic, it is about your patch
and to replace the existing implementation :)

Anyway, great work!!

Cheers,
-- 
Pierre
http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org