Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:3524
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20030720212053.04329448@127.0.0.1>
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 21:22:36 +0200
To: Marcus =?iso-8859-1?Q?B=F6rger?= <helly@php.net>
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
In-Reply-To: <1611216216.20030720201534@post.rwth-aachen.de>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20030720210749.0ee41bb0@127.0.0.1>
 <5.1.0.14.2.20030720210749.0ee41bb0@127.0.0.1>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5 Beta 2
From: andi@zend.com (Andi Gutmans)

At 08:15 PM 20/7/2003 +0200, Marcus B=F6rger wrote:
>Hello Andi,
>
>Sunday, July 20, 2003, 9:12:01 PM, you wrote:
>
>AG> Hi,
>
>AG> There have been loads of fixes since Beta 1, so I think it's time to=
 try
>AG> and get a beta 2 out of the door.
>
>AG> As I think three weeks is a good time frame and allows developers here=
 to
>AG> finish what they are working on, I think Monday 11th August is a good=
=20
>date.
>AG> Does that sound OK? Maybe people here should just send a note and=
 mention
>AG> what they are working on so that we can keep track?
>
>You know what i would work on when somebody would answer me.
>
>Besides that why again putting so much pressure? By doing so you're making
>wrong suggestions to our users. If you look at the list of problems and the
>list of errors which already made it into the bug database you should=
 really
>consider a slowdown.

Hmm, if we wait until all bugs are fixed we will wait for another 6 months.=
=20
As the current CVS is much better than beta 1, I think it makes sense to=20
release another one. Anyway, three weeks is a long time.
About answering you... You are usually answered quite quickly. It's not=20
always possible to answer you within two hours. Anyway, from what I can=20
see, Zeev answered you.

Andi