Newsgroups: php.internals,php.pdo
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:35141 php.pdo:113
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com from 64.97.136.187 cause and error)
Message-ID: <00df01c86697$90b90ac0$c6fc1f3e@foxbox>
Reply-To: "Steph Fox" <steph@zend.com>
To: "Lukas Kahwe Smith" <mls@pooteeweet.org>
Cc: "Pierre Joye" <pierre.php@gmail.com>,
	"Marcus Boerger" <helly@php.net>,
	"Markus Fischer" <markus@fischer.name>,
	<pdo@lists.php.net>,
	"internals" <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <00ce01c865c2$22f23aa0$c6fc1f3e@foxbox> <510220265.20080202204406@marcus-boerger.de> <019c01c865d5$2ebbacf0$c6fc1f3e@foxbox> <fe05d1540802021233n14dca604s413a750b9a52d0a7@mail.gmail.com> <155955105.20080203001830@marcus-boerger.de> <fe05d1540802021551l704ac0d9k435772b69da50295@mail.gmail.com> <1497821512.20080203014611@marcus-boerger.de> <47A575A9.7060903@fischer.name> <304490699.20080203115352@marcus-boerger.de> <fe05d1540802030547p46a53a68hb0c5e79573d025ae@mail.gmail.com> <00b301c86692$0f065230$c6fc1f3e@foxbox> <0F4513B3-129A-406E-80BA-3E6B37175E33@pooteeweet.org>
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 19:04:10 -0000
Organization: Zend Technologies
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PDO] Re: An Idea for PDO 2
From: steph@zend.com ("Steph Fox")

Moin Lukas,

>> Now, PECL has a couple of CLA'd modules already. I don't like them  being 
>> there, and you have stated your own opinion loud and clear. I  think we 
>> should be looking for some way to separate out CLA'd PECL  modules to 
>> elsewhere but leave the PECL structure in place for those  modules. It's 
>> important to offer at least that much, because as long  as the licensing 
>> is sound, CLA'd or not CLA'd doesn't impact end  users - just 
>> contributors.
>
> Well thanks to a separate PEAR channel, we have all the infrastructure 
> easily setup to have a different place for users to pick up the code.  Or 
> are you more concerned about the CVS, than the distribution of the 
> packages?

Eh? No, I'm concerned about binaries in the Windows version. We just don't 
have a working pecl install option. If anyone wants CVS they can use cvs or 
tortoisecvs or whatever, but that's irrelevant to users...

> Why copy to PECL in this case? Shouldnt it just be part of the PHP 
> distribution QA process?

Nobody liked my original PECLA idea (separate CVS module for CLA'd stuff but 
all PECL resources shared), so I'm trying to give it a different angle :) I 
preferred the first version tho'.

- Steph