Newsgroups: php.internals,php.pdo
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:35123 php.pdo:106
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com from 64.97.136.167 cause and error)
Message-ID: <000e01c8660b$3e3f2c20$c6fc1f3e@foxbox>
Reply-To: "Steph Fox" <steph@zend.com>
To: "Marcus Boerger" <helly@php.net>
Cc: <pdo@lists.php.net>,
	"internals" <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <00ce01c865c2$22f23aa0$c6fc1f3e@foxbox> <510220265.20080202204406@marcus-boerger.de> <019c01c865d5$2ebbacf0$c6fc1f3e@foxbox> <678698069.20080203001600@marcus-boerger.de>
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 02:19:42 -0000
Organization: Zend Technologies
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PDO] Re: [PHP-DEV] Fw: [PDO] [RFC] An Idea for PDO 2
From: steph@zend.com ("Steph Fox")

Personally I do a full pecl checkout alongside my php-src checkout, every 
time. The problems with that tend to come out during the build.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Marcus Boerger" <helly@php.net>
To: "Steph Fox" <steph@zend.com>
Cc: <pdo@lists.php.net>; "internals" <internals@lists.php.net>
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2008 11:16 PM
Subject: Re: [PDO] Re: [PHP-DEV] Fw: [PDO] [RFC] An Idea for PDO 2


> Hello Steph,
>
>  you would not checkout php-default. That would only be used for release
> management. Instead you would checkout php-src and whatever pecl modules 
> you
> wanted, just as you do today. And that includes that you can choose 
> whether
> you like CLA modules or not. Just as today you do not get all PECL 
> modules.
>
> marcus
>
> Saturday, February 2, 2008, 8:52:44 PM, you wrote:
>
>>>  all we need is to extend the PECL database with a license type field 
>>> and
>>> a
>>> CLA flag. Nothing else is required at that end. But we should still move
>>> as
>>> much from php-src/ext to pecl as we can.
>
>> Hm but then when you checked out you'd have CLA'd stuff as well as normal
>> PECL stuff, as now. Don't you find you automatically tend to fix things 
>> if
>> they're broken? I know I do... even if I rarely get around to posting 
>> those
>> fixes (because once everything works here I go on to the stuff I wanted 
>> to
>> do and forget there was even a problem, until the next time.)
>
>> I was just trying to find a way that would be acceptable to php.net and 
>> also
>> would mean PDO2 driver development doesn't have to wait on PECL process
>> decisions, but actually my off-list feedback says even a PECLA module
>> wouldn't be an acceptable option for some.
>
>> - Steph
>
>>> marcus
>
>
>
>
> Best regards,
> Marcus
>