Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:35121 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 40413 invoked by uid 1010); 2 Feb 2008 23:55:45 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 40398 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2008 23:55:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 Feb 2008 23:55:45 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.198.186 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.198.186 rv-out-0910.google.com Received: from [209.85.198.186] ([209.85.198.186:33829] helo=rv-out-0910.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id E1/AC-41947-00305A74 for ; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 18:55:45 -0500 Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k15so1045286rvb.23 for ; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 15:55:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=U7auMUmnN/pWxvJXKJpQdJoGdrD6BJCusXkmpxDXM14=; b=Y+PF7QnAJgmSETb/UUKkvJ5J+vCSXqM9gM3Kpd2yid+NvNv8g+xZ/gHqkSJRhVjz0e4Ae/0Dxj8ces9HgrtiEZmm46imP6KtME1fvTY3+oCGQMpjW3aNT+7ypGxHiv1ZNBrzjPlAjEnFTgSPtOx1NDloRnyIHRRaR3cnsYgZSXg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=T6wCxlJJoklvi7V1MevkREDlQuhK7sXdanRXWTjTO0mSaTDQ5xV1J5MGpaE2DTyxitsHMPI7oPdzlBLbP27haJfqkbABcyXQCSXvfV3rA0rahGqTI+fiV/NIWmVGQaLdoDXF12lFREY3InmNqs5T/2uXSiIyMzu4LEnNfhjSUis= Received: by 10.141.34.12 with SMTP id m12mr3599812rvj.26.1201996542131; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 15:55:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.151.21 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Feb 2008 15:55:42 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 00:55:42 +0100 To: "Marcus Boerger" Cc: "Steph Fox" , internals In-Reply-To: <924455377.20080203002229@marcus-boerger.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <01c801c865d8$2e837e90$c6fc1f3e@foxbox> <924455377.20080203002229@marcus-boerger.de> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Splitting the subject: the PECL/PHP relationship From: pierre.php@gmail.com ("Pierre Joye") On Feb 3, 2008 12:22 AM, Marcus Boerger wrote: > basically you are saying that zip would not have been used by anybody if > you hadn't forced us by mail bombardment to include it. What are you talking about? I post one proposal and it was accepted after the only issue was resolved (which was a long discussions). You are getting ridiculuous with your attacks Marcus, and I stay polite. And no, it is not the RM decisions to choose what goes in or out, despite your changing opinions about open source, openness and PHP.net. > So now I am > wondering why you care so much what goes in and what goes out? After all it > is the RMs decision. And we might get asked or not. What I was refering to is the possibility to have releases via pecl.php.net and official PHP releases, on a regular basis. -- Pierre http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org