Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:35119 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 34787 invoked by uid 1010); 2 Feb 2008 23:23:03 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 34771 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2008 23:23:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 Feb 2008 23:23:03 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=helly@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=helly@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 85.214.94.56 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: helly@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 85.214.94.56 aixcept.net Linux 2.6 Received: from [85.214.94.56] ([85.214.94.56:37278] helo=h1149922.serverkompetenz.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 87/CB-41947-75BF4A74 for ; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 18:23:03 -0500 Received: from MBOERGER-ZRH.corp.google.com (202-168.79-83.cust.bluewin.ch [83.79.168.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by h1149922.serverkompetenz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 422091B3524; Sun, 3 Feb 2008 00:23:00 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 00:22:29 +0100 Reply-To: Marcus Boerger X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <924455377.20080203002229@marcus-boerger.de> To: "Pierre Joye" CC: "Steph Fox" , internals In-Reply-To: References: <01c801c865d8$2e837e90$c6fc1f3e@foxbox> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Splitting the subject: the PECL/PHP relationship From: helly@php.net (Marcus Boerger) Hello Pierre, basically you are saying that zip would not have been used by anybody if you hadn't forced us by mail bombardment to include it. So now I am wondering why you care so much what goes in and what goes out? After all it is the RMs decision. And we might get asked or not. marcus Saturday, February 2, 2008, 9:38:04 PM, you wrote: > On Feb 2, 2008 9:14 PM, Steph Fox wrote: >> Thoughts? > It is also possible to have both. It is even a good thing for what > linux distributions told me about zip. About moving all extensions to > PECL, we already discussed this problem and the conclusion was to > continue like now. There was good reasons listed. > Cheers, > -- > Pierre > http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org Best regards, Marcus