Newsgroups: php.internals,php.pdo Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:35116 php.pdo:102 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 30602 invoked by uid 1010); 2 Feb 2008 23:16:40 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 30570 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2008 23:16:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 Feb 2008 23:16:40 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=helly@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=helly@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 85.214.94.56 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: helly@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 85.214.94.56 aixcept.net Linux 2.6 Received: from [85.214.94.56] ([85.214.94.56:49752] helo=h1149922.serverkompetenz.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 68/FA-41947-7D9F4A74 for ; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 18:16:40 -0500 Received: from MBOERGER-ZRH.corp.google.com (202-168.79-83.cust.bluewin.ch [83.79.168.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by h1149922.serverkompetenz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3AFE1B3669; Sun, 3 Feb 2008 00:16:35 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 00:16:00 +0100 Reply-To: Marcus Boerger X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <678698069.20080203001600@marcus-boerger.de> To: "Steph Fox" CC: pdo@lists.php.net, "internals" In-Reply-To: <019c01c865d5$2ebbacf0$c6fc1f3e@foxbox> References: <00ce01c865c2$22f23aa0$c6fc1f3e@foxbox> <510220265.20080202204406@marcus-boerger.de> <019c01c865d5$2ebbacf0$c6fc1f3e@foxbox> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PDO] Re: [PHP-DEV] Fw: [PDO] [RFC] An Idea for PDO 2 From: helly@php.net (Marcus Boerger) Hello Steph, you would not checkout php-default. That would only be used for release management. Instead you would checkout php-src and whatever pecl modules you wanted, just as you do today. And that includes that you can choose whether you like CLA modules or not. Just as today you do not get all PECL modules. marcus Saturday, February 2, 2008, 8:52:44 PM, you wrote: >> all we need is to extend the PECL database with a license type field and >> a >> CLA flag. Nothing else is required at that end. But we should still move >> as >> much from php-src/ext to pecl as we can. > Hm but then when you checked out you'd have CLA'd stuff as well as normal > PECL stuff, as now. Don't you find you automatically tend to fix things if > they're broken? I know I do... even if I rarely get around to posting those > fixes (because once everything works here I go on to the stuff I wanted to > do and forget there was even a problem, until the next time.) > I was just trying to find a way that would be acceptable to php.net and also > would mean PDO2 driver development doesn't have to wait on PECL process > decisions, but actually my off-list feedback says even a PECLA module > wouldn't be an acceptable option for some. > - Steph >> marcus Best regards, Marcus