Newsgroups: php.internals,php.pdo Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:35113 php.pdo:101 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 83741 invoked by uid 1010); 2 Feb 2008 20:33:17 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 83725 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2008 20:33:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 Feb 2008 20:33:17 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 64.233.166.176 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 64.233.166.176 py-out-1112.google.com Received: from [64.233.166.176] ([64.233.166.176:32267] helo=py-out-1112.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 52/E4-41947-C83D4A74 for ; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 15:33:17 -0500 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u77so1671786pyb.16 for ; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 12:33:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=/YiMpXD3nfupUE+1WKUAY3S/HG65E6Icl9ZlXaDZcPY=; b=bi4JrS6VNnMPIhdEfG7wlnJo26jhnxHTvdXC3X6e17CPXWKmObgqpha1X2jzDwXtgYWnqNIbx7wTVNqqt1e/kVXuf5Wk+5nAHJDTTrD6wd0MlFmfw24vqZ+QjXvN97xP9hecwqUxQ7Hj0yy3NWhcAo1INk3thPeru589r74t6wk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=W1X2muu33gHeylr3gsoqyfNDB/J4VX8MNhneC/4EGzXIe4qZUCWXVu5den1tQMI6SUOlKUz9pkUk8i/A/GDrvbwNwCV9oLEz4Hdz+I2x4tyu6N1ZDu5OUF6Qpp/Q94asE1GS4KjVX/bA2HZjLizBcap8PFJSyDDvhp0APfjvkgE= Received: by 10.141.18.14 with SMTP id v14mr3454258rvi.242.1201984393575; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 12:33:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.151.21 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Feb 2008 12:33:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 21:33:13 +0100 To: "Steph Fox" Cc: "Marcus Boerger" , pdo@lists.php.net, internals In-Reply-To: <019c01c865d5$2ebbacf0$c6fc1f3e@foxbox> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <00ce01c865c2$22f23aa0$c6fc1f3e@foxbox> <510220265.20080202204406@marcus-boerger.de> <019c01c865d5$2ebbacf0$c6fc1f3e@foxbox> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PDO] Re: [PHP-DEV] Fw: [PDO] [RFC] An Idea for PDO 2 From: pierre.php@gmail.com ("Pierre Joye") Hi, On Feb 2, 2008 8:52 PM, Steph Fox wrote: > > all we need is to extend the PECL database with a license type field and > > a > > CLA flag. Nothing else is required at that end. But we should still move > > as > > much from php-src/ext to pecl as we can. There is no place for CLA in pecl either. I still see zero reason to tolerate CLA in pecl.php.net or anywhere else. > I was just trying to find a way that would be acceptable to php.net and also > would mean PDO2 driver development doesn't have to wait on PECL process > decisions, but actually my off-list feedback says even a PECLA module > wouldn't be an acceptable option for some. It is not OK for me (to list one). The last attempt to create this exact solution (flag in pecl with automatic download of pdf to sign etc.) was sadly a failure. As it begins well, the communication between the company and us was not good at all and it was not possible to get answers in a reasonable time or simply no answer at all. Wez was also involved and was the initial contact between the company and php. -- Pierre http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org