Newsgroups: php.internals,php.pdo Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:35099 php.pdo:87 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 57773 invoked by uid 1010); 2 Feb 2008 11:56:04 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 57757 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2008 11:56:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 Feb 2008 11:56:04 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.198.187 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.198.187 rv-out-0910.google.com Received: from [209.85.198.187] ([209.85.198.187:24902] helo=rv-out-0910.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id B0/92-41947-25A54A74 for ; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 06:56:04 -0500 Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k15so951590rvb.23 for ; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 03:55:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=usxvb15uiCwsP64Jz/uTCEslQ7uAm+PIc/7tZ/9ZQ8Q=; b=vzu/r8kT+Z4wulF6CqeF64Ger1d18qVFa1UofhxCFVi1ozQ8P17rpM532z3CHcZPBQoLxLL3qUaK1e5N+mwd4EocastDf5pFhjmLKhumllD8R7IjSLptSMLXft4qyifTJN0hUNqzJPlfzElKTHho2CxMW4wttW7nMfulbG2FqS4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=FoO/2jCJSGL9mu6y8YckwVjdyyP5jHu2MiXMfyVGVilYvEtEGd3CkSYXKgytFKRFvUQ1nadO3M76Ed6fBTQHoLHBOL5/ko86FdCzcCJVpxG46frwSDewrjnwu7YFn+MAhO7RPFHGDqw7f/pyo2nKj5LU1t9RFAsh5hvDjiODpgw= Received: by 10.141.15.19 with SMTP id s19mr3195711rvi.124.1201953359764; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 03:55:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.151.21 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Feb 2008 03:55:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 12:55:59 +0100 To: RQuadling@googlemail.com Cc: "Adam Maccabee Trachtenberg" , "Antony Dovgal" , "Marcus Boerger" , pdo@lists.php.net, "PHP Internals" In-Reply-To: <10845a340802020315x3edb499cp924661994a729e65@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <37388396.20080201212653@marcus-boerger.de> <47A395BA.9020707@daylessday.org> <47A39F3C.7050704@daylessday.org> <10845a340802020315x3edb499cp924661994a729e65@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] An Idea for PDO 2 From: pierre.php@gmail.com ("Pierre Joye") Hi, On Feb 2, 2008 12:15 PM, Richard Quadling wrote: > If there is no CLA, will that mean we will not get the PDO 2 drivers > we need to be able to communicate with the databases? It would be really nice if the pro CLA camp stops to condition the existence of PDO (or its future) to the CLA acceptation. That's simply wrong. Oracle, IBM and MySql (which states their point already, they will accept the choice made by the php project) contribute already to php. The question is actually: Can they continue to ignore PHP or do they have to have their respective products working smoothly with PHP? The answer is pretty obvious and we see announces on a regular basis to proove they have to support PHP. Read the respective interviews or stories about PHP, the tone is completely different now than a year ago. -- Pierre http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org