Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:35066
Return-Path: <giunta.gaetano@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 47334 invoked by uid 1010); 1 Feb 2008 09:20:02 -0000
Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net
Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 47319 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2008 09:20:02 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 1 Feb 2008 09:20:02 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=giunta.gaetano@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=giunta.gaetano@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 72.14.214.233 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: giunta.gaetano@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 72.14.214.233 hu-out-0506.google.com  
Received: from [72.14.214.233] ([72.14.214.233:19958] helo=hu-out-0506.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id EC/73-22304-144E2A74 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 01 Feb 2008 04:20:01 -0500
Received: by hu-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 40so929382hub.13
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 01 Feb 2008 01:19:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender;
        bh=DTPKf+YDZnvhviGxJ5/IX0qyEdJ+ePZFYwV9bNjQ7uc=;
        b=gayiyrCPMc4b8oBejCvrvrc+DxDRbbzGCsosmUEiKa2f/nyf19iCfV2JNRemZspcvSS9UvWU5vIFL6XTYvHICmUHjVLC8/5343qfhsT3z8CNPm3mP55ktQQKOZOdofZYCgw62jJBxI285SCFgHDsivD/Qf2dzcj77hj9k9fSBp8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender;
        b=a+7aDhEzlIidSrkABUrNeHKtC1l2VmlsML2+dB3c7hWq36vHs0Igmz6XUI8Ll3N6HwJxHIudYU+skZTTxQwfMXEHTSS5SaabX3gxBZQTz+Bi2M0h7+eH1zP62wrcqUrVd7m4NnTNMi1OYxAZbsv6bIO3xDT2p8qJcIy7HY1L/YU=
Received: by 10.86.70.8 with SMTP id s8mr2971077fga.29.1201857598283;
        Fri, 01 Feb 2008 01:19:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?192.168.1.189? ( [82.123.1.254])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e11sm12419163fga.5.2008.02.01.01.19.56
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Fri, 01 Feb 2008 01:19:57 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <47A2E424.7050306@ez.no>
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 10:19:32 +0100
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: internals@lists.php.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: Gaetano Giunta <giunta.gaetano@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: json_encode() bug
From: gg@ez.no (Gaetano Giunta)

Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> ...
> The question is - should we have an error there? If 
> so, which one - E_WARNING, E_NOTICE? I'm for E_WARNING.

+1

Also please add at least a warning when errors are found in decoding process, so that it is somewhat feasible to distinguish a bad decode from json_decode('false')

Gaetano