Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:35056
Return-Path: <stefan.walk@physik.tu-darmstadt.de>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 53357 invoked by uid 1010); 31 Jan 2008 10:17:20 -0000
Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net
Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 53342 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2008 10:17:20 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 31 Jan 2008 10:17:20 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=stefan.walk@physik.tu-darmstadt.de; sender-id=unknown
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=stefan.walk@physik.tu-darmstadt.de; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain physik.tu-darmstadt.de from 62.75.137.136 cause and error)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: stefan.walk@physik.tu-darmstadt.de
X-Host-Fingerprint: 62.75.137.136 fuer-et.de Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4)
Received: from [62.75.137.136] ([62.75.137.136:54447] helo=eve.fuer-et.de)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id A5/CC-49295-E20A1A74 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 05:17:18 -0500
Received: from chillida.fkp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de (chillida.fkp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de [130.83.199.184])
	by eve.fuer-et.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B4D31C59C00
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 10:17:14 +0000 (UTC)
To: internals@lists.php.net
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:17:18 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7
References: <479114FD.6010005@zend.com> <47A0D72E.2010503@lerdorf.com> <47A0D588.1090305@zend.com>
In-Reply-To: <47A0D588.1090305@zend.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-ID: <200801311117.18205.stefan.walk@physik.tu-darmstadt.de>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] nowdocs again
From: stefan.walk@physik.tu-darmstadt.de (Stefan Walk)

On Wednesday 30 January 2008 20:52:40 Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> > I don't think the 'FOO' syntax is very obvious either, but I can't think
> > of a better one and if there isn't a commonly known syntax we can steal
> > from another language, then making up our own, no matter what it is, is
>
> We can steal from perl, which has exactly 'FOO' ;)
> --
> Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect
> stas@zend.com   http://www.zend.com/
> (408)253-8829   MSN: stas@zend.com

Ruby has, too (stolen from perl ;))

et@edea:~/programming/ruby> cat test.rb 
#!/usr/bin/env ruby
var = "ls *.rb"
puts <<"EOT"
#{var}
EOT
puts <<EOT
#{var}
EOT
puts <<'EOT'
#{var}
EOT
puts <<`EOT`
#{var}
EOT
et@edea:~/programming/ruby> ruby test.rb
ls *.rb
ls *.rb
#{var}
test.rb

Regards,
Stefan