Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:35049 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 79908 invoked by uid 1010); 30 Jan 2008 21:56:22 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 79893 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2008 21:56:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 30 Jan 2008 21:56:22 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tony@daylessday.org; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tony@daylessday.org; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain daylessday.org designates 89.208.40.236 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tony@daylessday.org X-Host-Fingerprint: 89.208.40.236 mail.daylessday.org Linux 2.6 Received: from [89.208.40.236] ([89.208.40.236:53837] helo=daylessday.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 81/E3-49295-482F0A74 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:56:21 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.34] (ppp85-140-121-169.pppoe.mtu-net.ru [85.140.121.169]) by daylessday.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16F406401E6; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 00:56:16 +0300 (MSK) Message-ID: <47A0F27F.3060904@daylessday.org> Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 00:56:15 +0300 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071114) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andi Gutmans CC: Stas Malyshev , PHP Internals References: <479114FD.6010005@zend.com> <47A07E86.4010008@zend.com> <47A08314.60507@daylessday.org> <47A0C487.3060604@zend.com> <47A0C725.2070001@daylessday.org> <698DE66518E7CA45812BD18E807866CE0133A752@us-ex1.zend.net> In-Reply-To: <698DE66518E7CA45812BD18E807866CE0133A752@us-ex1.zend.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] nowdocs again From: tony@daylessday.org (Antony Dovgal) On 31.01.2008 00:06, Andi Gutmans wrote: > I think it's actually pretty useful and not that uncommon to have large > chunks of text which you want to capture in a variable (and not deal > with the shortcomings of single quotes and/or output buffering in those > instances). Does this work for you? $string = << And we're not talking about something significant which > has risk associated with it and/or impacts other areas. Sure, this is just a new syntax, we add them every day. -- Wbr, Antony Dovgal