Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:35029 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 9520 invoked by uid 1010); 30 Jan 2008 15:18:12 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 9505 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2008 15:18:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 30 Jan 2008 15:18:12 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tony@daylessday.org; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tony@daylessday.org; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain daylessday.org designates 89.208.40.236 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tony@daylessday.org X-Host-Fingerprint: 89.208.40.236 mail.daylessday.org Linux 2.6 Received: from [89.208.40.236] ([89.208.40.236:50387] helo=daylessday.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id B6/84-14302-33590A74 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:18:11 -0500 Received: from [192.168.3.87] (unknown [212.42.62.198]) by daylessday.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 964B364015F; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 18:18:07 +0300 (MSK) Message-ID: <47A0952F.8040004@daylessday.org> Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 18:18:07 +0300 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071114) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marcus Boerger CC: Scott MacVicar , php-dev References: <47A05612.4020505@php.net> <1462818236.20080130160605@marcus-boerger.de> In-Reply-To: <1462818236.20080130160605@marcus-boerger.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] BC break with callbacks in 5.3 From: tony@daylessday.org (Antony Dovgal) On 30.01.2008 18:06, Marcus Boerger wrote: > Hello Scott, > > actually it was a bug. We, sorry I, did not spot this in earlier versions. > Now saying you rely on a bug in PHP 5 to be able to execute PHP 4 code > simply does not work. I believe the bug was to make non-static methods to behave differently depending on the way you call them. If calling class::method() directly produces E_STRICT notice, then calling call::method() as a callback should do the same. -- Wbr, Antony Dovgal