Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:35023 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 85413 invoked by uid 1010); 30 Jan 2008 14:35:12 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 85397 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2008 14:35:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 30 Jan 2008 14:35:12 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tony@daylessday.org; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tony@daylessday.org; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain daylessday.org designates 89.208.40.236 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tony@daylessday.org X-Host-Fingerprint: 89.208.40.236 mail.daylessday.org Linux 2.6 Received: from [89.208.40.236] ([89.208.40.236:40796] helo=daylessday.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 80/70-14302-F1B80A74 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 09:35:12 -0500 Received: from [192.168.3.87] (unknown [212.42.62.198]) by daylessday.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 585FC64015F; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 17:35:08 +0300 (MSK) Message-ID: <47A08B1B.9090304@daylessday.org> Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 17:35:07 +0300 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071114) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pierre Joye CC: Dmitry Stogov , Stanislav Malyshev , PHP Internals References: <479114FD.6010005@zend.com> <47A07E86.4010008@zend.com> <47A08314.60507@daylessday.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] nowdocs again From: tony@daylessday.org (Antony Dovgal) On 30.01.2008 17:19, Pierre Joye wrote: >> I believe it's far from readable and clear and I suggest not to add it until >> we have a better syntax. > > What do you suggest? :) I suggest to wait until we find a better syntax. I do not suggest any syntax myself because I do not see any need in this 'nowdoc' thing at all. -- Wbr, Antony Dovgal