Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:35021 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 72453 invoked by uid 1010); 30 Jan 2008 14:00:59 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 72437 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2008 14:00:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 30 Jan 2008 14:00:58 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tony@daylessday.org; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tony@daylessday.org; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain daylessday.org designates 89.208.40.236 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tony@daylessday.org X-Host-Fingerprint: 89.208.40.236 mail.daylessday.org Linux 2.6 Received: from [89.208.40.236] ([89.208.40.236:48089] helo=daylessday.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 32/4D-47977-71380A74 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 09:00:58 -0500 Received: from [192.168.3.87] (unknown [212.42.62.198]) by daylessday.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9127B64015F; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 17:00:52 +0300 (MSK) Message-ID: <47A08314.60507@daylessday.org> Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 17:00:52 +0300 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071114) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dmitry Stogov CC: Stanislav Malyshev , 'PHP Internals' References: <479114FD.6010005@zend.com> <47A07E86.4010008@zend.com> In-Reply-To: <47A07E86.4010008@zend.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] nowdocs again From: tony@daylessday.org (Antony Dovgal) On 30.01.2008 16:41, Dmitry Stogov wrote: > The final nowdoc patches are attached. > I'm going to commit them on Thursday in case of no objections. So the current syntax is $var = <<<'TEXT' text 'TEXT'; am I right? I believe it's far from readable and clear and I suggest not to add it until we have a better syntax. Also looking at the discussion, I can see only 6 people involved (including Dmitry), which most likely means nobody is really interested in that "nowdoc" and this is yet another reason not to add it. P.S. I personally see no need in such thing at all. -- Wbr, Antony Dovgal