Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:34971 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 91622 invoked by uid 1010); 28 Jan 2008 18:47:38 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 91607 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2008 18:47:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Jan 2008 18:47:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=helly@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=helly@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 85.214.94.56 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: helly@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 85.214.94.56 aixcept.net Linux 2.6 Received: from [85.214.94.56] ([85.214.94.56:50631] helo=h1149922.serverkompetenz.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 60/8C-25507-8432E974 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 13:47:38 -0500 Received: from dhcp-172-28-202-237.zrh.corp.google.com (unknown [193.142.125.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by h1149922.serverkompetenz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA681B34CA; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:47:34 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:48:20 +0100 Reply-To: Marcus Boerger X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <629972599.20080128194820@marcus-boerger.de> To: "Steph Fox" CC: "Marcus Boerger" , "Gregory Beaver" , "internals Mailing List" In-Reply-To: <031c01c861d7$d7ad2250$c6fc1f3e@foxbox> References: <479E1152.50301@chiaraquartet.net> <1216062773.20080128184927@marcus-boerger.de> <031c01c861d7$d7ad2250$c6fc1f3e@foxbox> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: re-proposal of pecl/phar for inclusion in core From: helly@php.net (Marcus Boerger) Hello Steph, so you mean we do not have to confuse our uses by solution 2a becasue we only have the minimum subset of zip in phar that ohar actually needs? marcus Monday, January 28, 2008, 7:01:42 PM, you wrote: > Hi Marcus, >> 1. include phar in core >> 2.a. add ext/zip compatible functions and replace ext/zip >> 2.b. change ext/zip to use zip lib of pahr and add stream support >> 3. drop ability to disable spl >> >> I have no preference between 2a or 2b. Though technically I guess that 2a >> is probably much faster to achive. > You're behind the times. Check it out; 18 of the 20 broken tests are down to > the fact that we can no longer 'knit' a pure zip archive because Greg > dropped the ext/zip dependency. >> p.s.: I haven't done much in regards to Phar lately - and can only say >> that >> you did an amazing not expect job. You turned Phar into something way >> better than we ever thought of. > Hear, hear! > - Steph Best regards, Marcus