Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:34786 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 70805 invoked by uid 1010); 15 Jan 2008 07:13:01 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 70790 invoked from network); 15 Jan 2008 07:13:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 15 Jan 2008 07:13:01 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ron@Opus1.COM; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ron@Opus1.COM; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain Opus1.COM designates 192.245.12.8 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ron@Opus1.COM X-Host-Fingerprint: 192.245.12.8 Viola.Opus1.COM OpenVMS 7.2 (Multinet 4.3-4.4 stack) Received: from [192.245.12.8] ([192.245.12.8:4439] helo=Viola.Opus1.COM) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 98/A2-45905-BFC5C874 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 02:13:01 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([24.21.169.102]) by Opus1.COM (PMDF V6.2-X27 #9830) with ESMTPSA id <01MQ3OXZPIR08YEB03@Opus1.COM> for internals@lists.php.net; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:12:51 -0700 (MST) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 23:12:50 -0800 In-reply-to: <478AC1E2.7040106@zend.com> To: Stanislav Malyshev Cc: Pierre , Lukas Kahwe Smith , PHP Developers Mailing List Message-ID: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Gpgmail-State: !signed References: <478AB57E.9020902@zend.com> <478AC1E2.7040106@zend.com> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] voting From: ron@Opus1.COM (Ronald Chmara) On Jan 13, 2008, at 5:58 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote: >>> Voting to achieve what? >> Fair decisions in a simpler, effective and right manner (and not >> discutable, ideally). > > I do not consider "fairness", whatever that could mean, having > anything to do with technical decisions regarding PHP, I vote that PHP should get a pony! Who's with me! Voting is good in that it helps express the wills and desires *of those who vote*. Some of those opinions may be wrong, insane, or silly, but it provides a means to evaluate an opinion professed by a group, rather than as an individual. IMSHO, for PHP, voting is an *informative*, not *conformative*, process. Let's take two arguments, with different heritages, authors, and origins. Suoshin patches. mysql_session patches. We could have 100% voted desire to make all of these HEAD, and still say "No." Voting expresses voter *will*, not outcome. For the former and latter, these are feature, not technical, requests. > neither I think counting votes is the process that allows to arrive > to a decision best for PHP. That's why votes influence, but do not determine, outcomes. > I personally know very little about some areas of PHP code, It's a big club. We should get T-shirts. > and it make little sense that my vote would carry the same weight > as opinion of the person that wrote and maintains the code. There's > nothing in arithmetic majority of people that makes any decision > better, more effective, more right and not disputable. Thousands of > people can be wrong as easy as one person can be, and one person > can be as right as a thousand. True, that. For those not versed in US-style democracy, the way we do it here is to elect (theoretically) somebody with a clue. Their one "clue" easily vote trumps thousands. The thing is, is that, well, if Rasmus, Zeev, Andi, Wez, *whoever* has a big voice, stopped listening or went insane or *whatever*, we have to have a way of fixing such a case. > Also, vast majority of PHP users never read this list and would > know nothing of any votes held or announced here, so representing > that as a poll reflecting opinion of a millions-wide PHP community > makes no sense whatsoever. Agreed. -Ronabop