Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:34763 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 81041 invoked by uid 1010); 12 Jan 2008 14:56:44 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 81026 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2008 14:56:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Jan 2008 14:56:44 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=greg@chiaraquartet.net; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=greg@chiaraquartet.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain chiaraquartet.net from 38.99.98.18 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: greg@chiaraquartet.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 38.99.98.18 beast.bluga.net Linux 2.6 Received: from [38.99.98.18] ([38.99.98.18:41871] helo=mail.bluga.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 61/61-63424-C25D8874 for ; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 09:56:44 -0500 Received: from mail.bluga.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.bluga.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 119B6C0FB0E; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 07:56:45 -0700 (MST) Received: from [192.168.0.106] (CPE-76-84-11-224.neb.res.rr.com [76.84.11.224]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.bluga.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAC6FC0FB0B; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 07:56:44 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <4788D546.10108@chiaraquartet.net> Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 08:57:10 -0600 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lukas Kahwe Smith CC: PHP Developers Mailing List References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: Re: voting From: greg@chiaraquartet.net (Gregory Beaver) Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: > Hi, > > I think its painfully obvious that a system to manage the voting is > needed. Like I said, ideally it should also have an email interface. > People should be able to vote from +1 to -1 and be able to add a > comment. Notifications should be send to this list about the start and > final result of the vote. > > Voting itself should be split by people with access to cvs.php.net and > those that do not. This is open source, everybody can voice their > opinions, but the developers of the project should have final say. > However if the end user and developer votes diverge greatly it will > still be an important hint to take into account. That being said, end > user polling imho belongs somewhere else and before the final developer > vote. > > The features of PEPr in PEAR cover all of this quite well, except for > the email interface. I personally would not need that and maybe its too > much of a hassle to get this done in a reliable and secure way. PEPr, unfortunately, is very tightly bound to the pearweb code, and would be a big hassle to separate as it currently stands. We have been working (by we, I mostly mean Helgi) for over a year now trying to clean up pearweb and still are only about halfway through the codebase, but when PEPr is tackled, I will let you all know. Of course, if there is someone enterprising who wants to assist with that specific part of the cleanup, the code is in cvs at pearweb/. PEPr-specific code is located in pearweb/include/pepr, pearweb/public_html/pepr, and pearweb/cron/pepr.php. Thanks, Greg