Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:34642
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.146.179 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=Ufe7GBipG7p8+rj+gzgAlAFdeljUEPqPG/IrUfz6QC4UtpXpsWbtecpKDEwxNYPqNzUxO91fuQUqW1h3MjncmQmC72jdV0kArRrEdXfEq9Kk0AEr9lXjU30KSMKSwrYRqM5cSVOk6uASx+ZEy7NgqUuXgtCwhaIoCgLXckovHrQ=
Message-ID: <3d1a63d10801100618g36423c5bocf2c755c4c457f07@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 16:18:36 +0200
To: "Hannes Magnusson" <hannes.magnusson@gmail.com>
Cc: "Marcus Boerger" <helly@php.net>, "Ryusuke SEKIYAMA" <rsky0711@gmail.com>, 
	internals@lists.php.net, "Stanislav Malyshev" <stas@zend.com>
In-Reply-To: <7f3ed2c30801100556y14b27d5es24eb8865b9f330e2@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <cfac20c70801100207g543a8bb6if21f5b35cdbeccb7@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1665325616.20080110111902@marcus-boerger.de>
	 <7f3ed2c30801100556y14b27d5es24eb8865b9f330e2@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Square brackets shortcut
From: d.giedrius@gmail.com ("Giedrius D")

Hi,

On Jan 10, 2008 3:56 PM, Hannes Magnusson <hannes.magnusson@gmail.com> wrote:
> So you reject scalar type hinting because it isn't type casting and
> can therefor confuses newbies - but scattering seemingly random
> brackets around your code (to safe 5 key strokes) is obvious to users?
>
> Noone would confuse this with named arguments?
> Why can't I do function foo([] $array) {} ?
Can you do function foo(array() $array) {} ?

>
> foo([]);
> $var = [];
> Is this really readable?
Looks readable to me ;-)

FWIW if it's going to be implemented I think (b) should be the choice
as it is more consistent with current syntax even though I like (a)
more.

>
> Are you really serious about this?
>
> -Hannes
>
>
>
> On Jan 10, 2008 11:19 AM, Marcus Boerger <helly@php.net> wrote:
> > Hello Ryusuke,
> >
> >   I like b) !
> >
> > marcus
> >
> >
> > Thursday, January 10, 2008, 11:07:36 AM, you wrote:
> >
> > > Hello, lists,
> >
> > > I'm tired to type "array()" many times. And I want to
> > > declare arrays more easily. So I wrote the patch for
> > > zend_language_parser.y which enables to declare arrays
> > > with square brackets like some other languages.
> >
> > > Stanislav,
> > > Sorry, I'm new in this list and I didn't know about past
> > > discussion. As Marcus says, I'd like to ask around again.
> >
> >
> > > There are three options:
> >
> > >  a) Commit square bracket array shortcut patch
> > >     keys and values are separated by colons.
> > >     ( http://www.opendogs.org/pub/php-5.3dev-080109-sbar.patch )
> > >     e.g.
> > >     $a = [1, 2, 3];
> > >     $b = ['foo': 'orange', 'bar': 'apple', 'baz': 'lemon'];
> >
> > >  b) Commit square bracket array shortcut patch
> > >     keys and values are separated by double arrows.
> > >     ( http://www.opendogs.org/pub/php-5.3dev-080109-sbar2.patch )
> > >     e.g.
> > >     $a = [1, 2, 3];
> > >     $b = ['foo' => 'orange', 'bar' => 'apple', 'baz' => 'lemon'];
> >
> > >  c) Reject and keep using `array()'.
> > >     e.g.
> > >     $a = array(1, 2, 3);
> > >     $b = array('foo' => 'orange', 'bar' => 'apple', 'baz' => 'lemon');
> >
> > > These patches include the tests.
> >
> > > Which do you like? I like (a) the best.
> >
> >
> > > Regards,
> >
> >
> > > 2008/1/6, Marcus Boerger <helly@php.net>:
> > >> Hello Stanislav,
> > >>
> > >>   tha makesw three then already, how about we ask around again?
> > >> Ryusuke, can you please start a new '[RFC] Square brackets shortcut' thread
> > >> to collect opinions and pass along the patch for that?
> > >>
> > >> I like the anonymous function patch too. It is clean and simple. Maybe you
> > >> want to start a second '[RFC] Anonymous functions' thread with that patch.
> > >>
> > >> Can you also please add tests for both?
> > >>
> > >> marcus
> > >>
> > >> Wednesday, January 2, 2008, 7:51:06 PM, you wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >> the square bracket array syntax patch for PHP 5.3,
> > >> >>   http://www.opendogs.org/pub/php-5.3dev-080101-sbar.patch
> > >>
> > >> > I remember we discussed that already and it was rejected then (even
> > >> > though myself and Andi liked it) - did the people that objected then
> > >> > change their minds?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Best regards,
> > >>  Marcus
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
> > > --
> > > /**
> > >  * Ryusuke SEKIYAMA
> > >  * rsky0711@gmail.com
> > >  */
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Best regards,
> >  Marcus
> >
> >
> > --
> > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> >
> >
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>

Regards,
Giedrius