Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:34502 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 9774 invoked by uid 1010); 5 Jan 2008 12:12:01 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 9759 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2008 12:12:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 5 Jan 2008 12:12:01 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=magnus@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=magnus@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 83.150.147.20 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: magnus@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 83.150.147.20 novell.stoldgods.nu Received: from [83.150.147.20] ([83.150.147.20:39114] helo=novell.stoldgods.nu) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 78/38-52950-E047F774 for ; Sat, 05 Jan 2008 07:12:00 -0500 Received: from novell (novell [10.0.2.1]) by novell.stoldgods.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3CAF80E for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2008 13:12:24 +0100 (CET) To: internals@lists.php.net Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 13:12:54 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) References: <477DB7BF.10201@chiaraquartet.net> <477ED4DB.6090703@sci.fi> <7f3ed2c30801050218q49023642u7edf6ac2a9966389@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <7f3ed2c30801050218q49023642u7edf6ac2a9966389@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-ID: <200801051312.54882.magnus@php.net> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] type hinting From: magnus@php.net (Magnus =?iso-8859-1?q?M=E4=E4tt=E4?=) On Saturday 05 January 2008, Hannes Magnusson wrote: > On Jan 5, 2008 1:52 AM, Jani Taskinen kirjoitti: > > Anyway, who dropped the word "OPTIONAL" from the subject? I think that was quite > > essential part of this whole debate? As I'm +1 for OPTIONAL scalar-type hinting. > > +1 on scalar-type-hinting (not to be confused with type-casting) I'm also +1 for optional scalar-type hinting FWIW. Magnus