Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:34433 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 75533 invoked by uid 1010); 4 Jan 2008 18:06:32 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 75517 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2008 18:06:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Jan 2008 18:06:32 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=robert@interjinn.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=robert@interjinn.com; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain interjinn.com from 66.11.173.122 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: robert@interjinn.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 66.11.173.122 unknown Received: from [66.11.173.122] ([66.11.173.122:52042] helo=blobule.interjinn.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 34/64-63281-6A57E774 for ; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 13:06:31 -0500 Received: by blobule.interjinn.com (Postfix, from userid 2000) id 1F9FA5AD4B9; Fri, 4 Jan 2008 13:06:27 -0500 (EST) To: Sam Barrow Cc: Alain Williams , Pierre , Marcus Boerger , Gregory Beaver , internals Mailing List In-Reply-To: <1199469206.15292.164.camel@sbarrow-desktop> References: <477DB7BF.10201@chiaraquartet.net> <20080104105558.GC7861@mint.phcomp.co.uk> <477E5649.2080104@chiaraquartet.net> <1463438959.20080104182050@marcus-boerger.de> <1199468241.6629.53.camel@blobule> <20080104175141.GC12202@mint.phcomp.co.uk> <1199469206.15292.164.camel@sbarrow-desktop> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: InterJinn Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 13:06:26 -0500 Message-ID: <1199469986.6629.77.camel@blobule> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] type hinting From: robert@interjinn.com (Robert Cummings) On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 12:53 -0500, Sam Barrow wrote: > On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 17:51 +0000, Alain Williams wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 12:37:19PM -0500, Robert Cummings wrote: > > > > > IMHO, optionally inclusion of type hinting for functions/methods can > > > only be a boon to code quality and readability. IMHO when a type hint is > > > provided and a parameter doesn't match the type hint then I think a > > > fatal error should occur. This forces the user of the function that has > > > type hinting to ensure their data is of the correct type. This prevents > > > accidental wrong data conversion. However, I see the other side of the > > > coin too where automatic type conversion could be desirable also. > > > Perhaps a mixed solution would be viable? > > > > > > > > > > > function foo( require int $a, require string $b ){} > > > > > > foo( '5', 'bleh' ); // <-- fatal error > > > > No. > > > > > ?> > > > > > > Contrast versus: > > > > > > > > > > > function foo( int $a, string $b ){} > > > > > > foo( '5', 'bleh' ); // <-- no exception or error $a in foo() will > > > // be type int (automatic conversion) > > > > Yes. If $a is '5' but reject if $a is '5five'. > > This is what I was considering, but to do something like this we will > have to implement a whole separate rule set just for type hint > conversion. Personally I think it's a bit silly to allow '5' and reject '5five'. The following is fairly standard behaviour in PHP: All produce 5. Cheers, Rob. -- ........................................................... SwarmBuy.com - http://www.swarmbuy.com Leveraging the buying power of the masses! ...........................................................