Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:34420 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 35468 invoked by uid 1010); 4 Jan 2008 17:23:19 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 35453 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2008 17:23:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Jan 2008 17:23:19 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.198.189 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.198.189 rv-out-0910.google.com Received: from [209.85.198.189] ([209.85.198.189:2029] helo=rv-out-0910.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 43/6C-63281-58B6E774 for ; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 12:23:19 -0500 Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k15so5092101rvb.23 for ; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 09:23:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=J0RbeHAviR5137GmG8CXtdOSkrgMrNcAaz0GfKX8ca8=; b=gkCbJ+8IBjXFjgecP8phJsaWksJE3HglQMAQY5JBnZGu/ssnUgYBUbuYfYwjWPOx5xg7FTvppNsFnEX5IUiLeIH0BHe4DmDhV1LBp1alz3dkm3+VHG/5K2eejIF89kXhGoMc9hhJ113MVAtL6dSLOny2V4WXABm//3Lj4A4J3XA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=pBgAi0p+6r3lo+YoWq5+SdbJhr1nmnZ49tltdALE4nItMh3zpbdKnAuRjXHptaJm4Xz1rStU3RgE5cXuX/xjgxy7oZsOVGMOP0VA1b4KyLsnZQwtZexMVZmxdERHGakpFNl1/ec9aZRfye/lnZyyKo2Q6CW8YHlWJNFgmZrC52E= Received: by 10.141.141.3 with SMTP id t3mr3329519rvn.72.1199467393430; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 09:23:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.177.21 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Jan 2008 09:23:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 18:23:13 +0100 To: "Marcus Boerger" Cc: "Gregory Beaver" , "Alain Williams" , "internals Mailing List" In-Reply-To: <1463438959.20080104182050@marcus-boerger.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <477DB7BF.10201@chiaraquartet.net> <20080104105558.GC7861@mint.phcomp.co.uk> <477E5649.2080104@chiaraquartet.net> <1463438959.20080104182050@marcus-boerger.de> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] type hinting From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre) On Jan 4, 2008 6:20 PM, Marcus Boerger wrote: > Hello Pierre, > > we never accepted this as a pro argument. Infact we often saw the > necessaity to highlight something is optional to vote against it. We do this > for a reason. That is we only want to support mainstream features. My point of view is that this feature should be a mainstream feature. To make it optional was to lower the issues for those who don't care about argument strictness. We did not give them this choice for the OO strictness. -- Pierre http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org