Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:34315
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.198.186 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=YyDhRpt6UFbjnUtM7mh4Z3IZGdb7HIJtAO7GlHHSX60VpOeO5zHgu+lm/EryakNS9IbGY7In/8TP3noU+M9WEpQtyc+Bau7FLMY3iUBowxL86stKR73BLxH8cRMsnvTKSfpdeynUY+hLX1VK3BBQQTzmUFTILmtZ+2ZO/DQVAvo=
Message-ID: <fe05d1540801010935i254b0396s738cd6f2e3d9d478@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 18:35:28 +0100
To: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Johannes_Schl=FCter?=" <johannes@php.net>
Cc: "Marcus Boerger" <helly@php.net>, internals@lists.php.net
In-Reply-To: <1199206970.27543.30.camel@johannes.nop>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <99cd336d0712280356v680cc82fh3b1396c9c608bb96@mail.gmail.com>
	 <b5f7bf6c0712280630o1b92e9a7qd11b30320b072216@mail.gmail.com>
	 <fe05d1540712280857l16595f1l2ea3ea576e1e400f@mail.gmail.com>
	 <99cd336d0712281728g6659d7e6pa3ed92db5574e63b@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1944505528.20071230185830@marcus-boerger.de>
	 <fe05d1540712311031s6f616db1n9d228dd4b5a6a49f@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1668621659.20071231224547@marcus-boerger.de>
	 <1199206970.27543.30.camel@johannes.nop>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] spl_autoload vs __autoload
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre)

On Jan 1, 2008 6:02 PM, Johannes Schl=FCter <johannes@php.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 2007-12-31 at 22:45 +0100, Marcus Boerger wrote:
> > Hello Johannes,
> >
> >   I agree with Pierre here. How about finally making SPL built in
> > always
> >   like ext/standard?
>
> First some statistics: According to my numbers[1], which are as wrong as
> most other statistics about such stuff. 1% (36 of 3573) of the PHP 5
> installations have SPL disabled. So imo having it not forced-on is not a
> big problem for users.

The point is to do not have to worry about it being disabled.

Besides that statistics are pretty useless in this case (consider a
large intranet full of spless setups where you have to work and you
are done...).


> So in the end I'm +1 on the proposal for 5.3.

so let enable it :)

>
> On a related note: Imo for users the real problems are different
> extensions, which we won't enable by default (due to their dependency on
> external stuff) and which might be available on some host or different
> php.ini settings. For instance I was once annoyed by zlib not being
> available on a shared host or png not available for gd.

ISP not providing PNG? go to another :) But I thought we can't build
ext/gd without png, I have to check that again.

Happy new year :)


--=20
Pierre
http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org