Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:34308 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 48293 invoked by uid 1010); 31 Dec 2007 22:28:23 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 48277 invoked from network); 31 Dec 2007 22:28:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 31 Dec 2007 22:28:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=markus@fischer.name; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=markus@fischer.name; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain fischer.name from 62.179.121.40 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: markus@fischer.name X-Host-Fingerprint: 62.179.121.40 viefep20-int.chello.at Solaris 10 (beta) Received: from [62.179.121.40] ([62.179.121.40:38172] helo=viefep20-int.chello.at) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id C9/40-43572-30D69774 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2007 17:28:21 -0500 Received: from genuine.home ([84.112.136.139]) by viefep20-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.7.08.02.00 201-2186-121-20061213) with ESMTP id <20071231222817.BQHH10454.viefep20-int.chello.at@genuine.home>; Mon, 31 Dec 2007 23:28:17 +0100 Received: from chello084112136139.36.11.vie.surfer.at ([84.112.136.139] helo=[192.168.1.51]) by genuine.home with esmtpa (Exim 4.50) id 1J9T0p-0000xj-Js; Mon, 31 Dec 2007 23:21:40 +0100 Message-ID: <47796CFB.6070208@fischer.name> Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 23:28:11 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Beaver CC: Jessie Hernandez , internals@lists.php.net, dmitry@zend.com, stas@zend.com References: <476878B4.8000200@gmail.com> <4778E18A.3080605@fischer.name> <47792F73.8030804@php.net> In-Reply-To: <47792F73.8030804@php.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 OpenPGP: id=C2272BD0; url=http://markus.fischer.name/my_public_key.txt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -16 X-Spam-Level: - X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "genuine.home", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Greg, Greg Beaver wrote: > It is technically possible to fix this, on first glance it would involve > having the lexer return a T_STRING for any non-whitespace following > T_INTERFACE or between T_IMPLEMENTS and '{'. It would also need to > return T_STRING following T_INSTANCEOF. [...] > accepted, it's a fair amount of work to patch the lexer and make sure it > doesn't break crap. [...] Content analysis details: (-1.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -3.3 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts -0.4 BAYES_05 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 1 to 5% [score: 0.0129] 2.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP address [84.112.136.139 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] 0.0 UPPERCASE_25_50 message body is 25-50% uppercase 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Subject: Re: Interfaces name "Interface", was: [PHP-DEV] Re: Idea for namespacelookup resolution From: markus@fischer.name (Markus Fischer) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Greg, Greg Beaver wrote: > It is technically possible to fix this, on first glance it would involve > having the lexer return a T_STRING for any non-whitespace following > T_INTERFACE or between T_IMPLEMENTS and '{'. It would also need to > return T_STRING following T_INSTANCEOF. [...] > accepted, it's a fair amount of work to patch the lexer and make sure it > doesn't break crap. I'm totally with your here. I can live very well with "Iface" instead. Just wanted to make sure it's not an oversight on my side. Thanks for the (gory) details ;) - - Markus -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHeWz71nS0RcInK9ARAiSXAJ9QCQ8VZHJW7/ZOaDRfQ/y84hqZygCfXUai YMHu2WIqLCKsKiqj9GwfKXY= =twv1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----