Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:34273 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 81097 invoked by uid 1010); 28 Dec 2007 16:57:09 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 81082 invoked from network); 28 Dec 2007 16:57:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Dec 2007 16:57:09 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.198.185 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.198.185 rv-out-0910.google.com Received: from [209.85.198.185] ([209.85.198.185:57959] helo=rv-out-0910.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id FB/1B-22266-EDA25774 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2007 11:57:07 -0500 Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k15so2818797rvb.23 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2007 08:57:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=OmMF+aqUMKA9s3aXiHjxjryfi/+UmV9LawdZ5IyPupA=; b=h7aj+WAOrvvDhyK3Tty+XY4zTZUGvdqH0g6zpu2hQ6gg0L+2ULw1TyMnz0YFpBDC0CpmJ+ZPKWQKsb95gLLPYTZw8mvMMHLKzjEVNM4/+P5aJzPmj4Es/va94Ea+KcKNBSXtzFaucJ2gFWKUrEQnHFghLiFIBFIIUlA0AzEudVU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=h3gj91iuvMZr64iobiGmLhGWtjAFmrTgxhgfZVjCIQIRFQ9vDhwqwnEOs4ijS7UruTP5PZ5Ul5Nyw1FeFIkK4LWJMXPyaOmgrHBSSwqBS0GljI1LvSsYRgewcKZoZffN6WdimmqMqvXzgmqTQnvNHdPOq5ntqrXwBn65BzkLEU0= Received: by 10.140.180.13 with SMTP id c13mr4863542rvf.153.1198861020240; Fri, 28 Dec 2007 08:57:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.177.21 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Dec 2007 08:57:00 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 17:57:00 +0100 To: david.coallier@nyphp.com Cc: "Andrew Mason" , internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <99cd336d0712280356v680cc82fh3b1396c9c608bb96@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] spl_autoload vs __autoload From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre) On Dec 28, 2007 3:30 PM, wrote: > On Dec 28, 2007 6:56 AM, Andrew Mason wrote: > > Hi guys, > > Can anyone shed some light on the advantages of the spl_autoload over > > the standard __autoload ? is there any ? > > > > Please use php-general for that kind of question. This question makes sense here and brings yet again the question why such things are not available by default. -- Pierre http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org