Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:34269 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 11371 invoked by uid 1010); 28 Dec 2007 13:13:52 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 11356 invoked from network); 28 Dec 2007 13:13:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Dec 2007 13:13:52 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=indeyets@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=indeyets@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 64.233.178.243 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: indeyets@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 64.233.178.243 hs-out-0708.google.com Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from [64.233.178.243] ([64.233.178.243:23891] helo=hs-out-2122.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 9F/A2-22266-D86F4774 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2007 08:13:50 -0500 Received: by hs-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id l65so2357168hsc.7 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2007 05:13:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=tOfuU5yL/W94HEkH1dxSRYxfY1rKICM7CQaRy5MA+2I=; b=MPDO+T/LdWAuMBdERubXxMhfzhvE9RRnhl/l4cOGaJBhmDw/2zRk61ESZ8pPDHkKu6q5By7rH3dsnvF47LDVVCBIItIBB4/oq8pzA+83rBVh6c48vCSVdizO1UhedwVg4oK0dCJcf5eAM17eTv/UhLUx5bTWO8pOElCSus9YJZQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=oH/p0OwULk6cDIqgHXMjpiGCzmUz7IVkjnX01l54G674swPoSPmbesynVZ86ZnIBpqgxu0PK7QjekywveCTKdehH53Tqp65RkFzU/rQuXENiolU1/ri5Rja4OT+QcIQNRRjEd3xHkolCXbOJtyZ6GjN0uG1BKU7BBKqE0qrEiqM= Received: by 10.150.155.1 with SMTP id c1mr696840ybe.155.1198847627435; Fri, 28 Dec 2007 05:13:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.150.52.9 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Dec 2007 05:13:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 16:13:47 +0300 To: "Andrew Mason" Cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <99cd336d0712280356v680cc82fh3b1396c9c608bb96@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <99cd336d0712280356v680cc82fh3b1396c9c608bb96@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] spl_autoload vs __autoload From: indeyets@gmail.com ("Alexey Zakhlestin") On 12/28/07, Andrew Mason wrote: > Can anyone shed some light on the advantages of the spl_autoload over > the standard __autoload ? is there any ? sure. spl_autoload allows you to have many independent autoloaders -- Alexey Zakhlestin http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/