Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:34187
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 64.233.162.234 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=PMlKgn/NeRa336Sv6km/Qw2Vz1jLkjLcvoMjAeZyULimXfL1YbkLoSnWsu9vyX5ZAvDVAEy/1kLi6TgS6xMBwVh1TQrg+k5FwziHcfQs95sXni7NX5YPn0U+nMHUwr+C0jJ08NFKqYch1kxdcyA0/4q6Ima+67w8SgFvuCFKcRg=
Message-ID: <52dbac0f0712201509h426c1208i7c035793653aa711@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 20:09:39 -0300
To: "Greg Beaver" <cellog@php.net>
Cc: "PHP Developers Mailing List" <internals@lists.php.net>
In-Reply-To: <476AE52F.9090607@php.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_23320_28486019.1198192179654"
References: <52dbac0f0712201120x2b8cd45dne6097fe4c57ee281@mail.gmail.com>
	 <476AE52F.9090607@php.net>
Subject: Re: Question on "use" behavior
From: malterisio777@gmail.com ("Martin Alterisio")

------=_Part_23320_28486019.1198192179654
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

2007/12/20, Greg Beaver <cellog@php.net>:
>
> Martin Alterisio wrote:
> > Consider the following code:
> >
> > test.php:
> > <?php
> > include 'foo.php';
> > use test::foo;
> > foo();
> > ?>
> >
> > foo.php:
> > <?php
> > namespace test;
> > function foo() { }
> > ?>
> >
> > Is it expected behavior that the scripts ends in:
> > Fatal error: Call to undefined function foo()
> > ?
>
> Hi Martin,
>
> No.  This is a bug, I was alluding to it in an earlier email, but you
> know how time eats up one's life, so I haven't reported it and would
> grateful if someone would (or Dmitry/Stas would just know why it is
> broken and fix it :)
>
> Greg
>

Thank you. Sorry I didn't read your mail about this bug. I'll look into it a
bit more and post a bug report.

Have you seen my post scriptum in the first mail about benchmarks? Any idea
of what I could use to test the performance of the unsolved name resolutions
that are pushed into the executer? I expect there won't be any considerable
performance penalty but just want to be completely sure.

------=_Part_23320_28486019.1198192179654--