Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:34164
Return-Path: <malterisio777@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 68732 invoked by uid 1010); 20 Dec 2007 19:20:08 -0000
Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net
Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 68716 invoked from network); 20 Dec 2007 19:20:08 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 20 Dec 2007 19:20:08 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=malterisio777@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=malterisio777@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 64.233.178.244 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: malterisio777@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 64.233.178.244 hs-out-0708.google.com Linux 2.4/2.6
Received: from [64.233.178.244] ([64.233.178.244:3424] helo=hs-out-2122.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 95/B1-59226-760CA674 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 14:20:07 -0500
Received: by hs-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id l65so3501673hsc.7
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 11:20:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type;
        bh=jl7upWytxt+VufCrzDSW1k+Kp1nhBuhKXn9yfisUV4g=;
        b=HnH3WOlvRlwV47BsAkV66BGSl29zqHiXkkA4z73qkCtTDPUROLMGjsRiwqWT/nRifanzwQ58M1d1sOsxat9cG7c7iMg2bRho/qsLJGz0MhTihXr5zRztoiVNGCnfajkQfFBkjW+ohNFa7v/Cojb3L79+rWiu/rOYxYvi6Z/sdlY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type;
        b=YqnQhTjXT5ZlEgfGI/ZWcxuIQ33jdLt9xJPIvyIm13uG6ooCWOtSbUcnehLiEsiDoc7YHT3L2pBZHvUMFOjzqsG2ivsI35wqoNpVPR7gGKAK/2hp6rsNT44Y+FFw+9OGPfwUF8CoxlJevhV6IWmqQ8y54ctRrilGIKlIqta38yI=
Received: by 10.142.171.6 with SMTP id t6mr279602wfe.126.1198178404434;
        Thu, 20 Dec 2007 11:20:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.142.157.9 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 11:20:04 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <52dbac0f0712201120x2b8cd45dne6097fe4c57ee281@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:20:04 -0300
To: "PHP Developers Mailing List" <internals@lists.php.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_22646_18184237.1198178404414"
Subject: Question on "use" behavior
From: malterisio777@gmail.com ("Martin Alterisio")

------=_Part_22646_18184237.1198178404414
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Consider the following code:

test.php:
<?php
include 'foo.php';
use test::foo;
foo();
?>

foo.php:
<?php
namespace test;
function foo() { }
?>

Is it expected behavior that the scripts ends in:
Fatal error: Call to undefined function foo()
?

That's all for now.
Best regards,

Martin Alterisio

PS: Is there any benchmark that could be run to test out what's the impact
of the delayed name resolutions? I believe is not considerable but I'd like
to test in my machine and provide some feedback, and I don't know if what
I'm trying to do as benchmark is reliable ("time <phpscript>" and
shell-scripting for data compilation).

------=_Part_22646_18184237.1198178404414--