Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:34096 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 63145 invoked by uid 1010); 18 Dec 2007 19:05:11 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 63130 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2007 19:05:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 18 Dec 2007 19:05:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=derick@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=derick@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 82.94.239.7 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: derick@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.94.239.7 mail.jdi-ict.nl Linux 2.6 Received: from [82.94.239.7] ([82.94.239.7:43040] helo=mail.jdi-ict.nl) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 9B/ED-13895-4E918674 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 14:05:09 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.jdi-ict.nl (8.13.7/8.12.11) with ESMTP id lBIJ53bo024403; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:05:04 +0100 Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:05:06 +0100 (CET) X-X-Sender: derick@kossu.ez.no To: Wez Furlong cc: Travis Raybold , internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <089F7DB1-5F13-4F04-91C2-8407029A18B1@gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <98edc0cf0712180736v4c54feddp338532c191c30c49@mail.gmail.com> <089F7DB1-5F13-4F04-91C2-8407029A18B1@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Will pay for fixes for bugs in PDO/PDO_ODBC From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, Wez Furlong wrote: > Your statement is not accurate: > http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/CVSROOT/avail?r1=1.1200&r2=1.1201 > > This should not be a blocker to anyone that wants to take this up. Missed that it was "removed" already. However, having a "restriction" in the first round does make people lose interest in specific bits of extensions - this is also why I am against any sort of restriction of committing on any bit of code inside the PHP core distribution. > Anyhow, if anyone does want to take Travis up on his offer, you'll need the > attached patch. JFYI: Mail.app is broken, please add attachments as attachments instead of "dragging" it in - it splits a normal mail up in two, so I almost missed this part: > PS: More on PDO soon; it has not been forgotten despite sickness, work > and so forth. Things like that happen, but it would have been *much* more proper to bring those things up *before* actually implementing something that many seem to be quite everse against. regards, Derick -- Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl | http://ezcomponents.org | http://xdebug.org