Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:34071 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 31863 invoked by uid 1010); 17 Dec 2007 19:46:02 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 31846 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2007 19:46:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 Dec 2007 19:46:02 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=helly@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=helly@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 85.214.94.56 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: helly@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 85.214.94.56 aixcept.net Linux 2.6 Received: from [85.214.94.56] ([85.214.94.56:49101] helo=h1149922.serverkompetenz.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 37/37-20687-3F1D6674 for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 14:46:00 -0500 Received: from dhcp-172-28-204-176.zrh.corp.google.com (unknown [193.142.125.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by h1149922.serverkompetenz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C2D71B365C; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 20:45:39 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 20:45:39 +0100 Reply-To: Marcus Boerger X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <992702712.20071217204539@marcus-boerger.de> To: Stanislav Malyshev CC: Alexey Zakhlestin , Wez Furlong , troels knak-nielsen , In-Reply-To: <4766AE6E.3050500@zend.com> References: <98b8086f0712150818n40056cedyf0aae7a5a08a27b7@mail.gmail.com> <4764CC64.3040608@zend.com> <623025726.20071217140947@marcus-boerger.de> <4766AE6E.3050500@zend.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PATCH: anonymous functions in PHP From: helly@php.net (Marcus Boerger) Hello Stanislav, I do not see anything broken here. All I see is discussing a patch to death just because it doesn't do what everybody wants. marcus Monday, December 17, 2007, 6:14:22 PM, you wrote: >> and for that reason we should do it! Can't Wez simply apply this? > I think we saw numerous examples that "commit first, think later" > approach is not the best one... > -- > Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect > stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/ > (408)253-8829 MSN: stas@zend.com Best regards, Marcus