Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:34040 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 46175 invoked by uid 1010); 15 Dec 2007 16:18:53 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 46160 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2007 16:18:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 15 Dec 2007 16:18:53 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=troelskn@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=troelskn@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.198.189 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: troelskn@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.198.189 rv-out-0910.google.com Received: from [209.85.198.189] ([209.85.198.189:53509] helo=rv-out-0910.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id E5/F9-63617-B6EF3674 for ; Sat, 15 Dec 2007 11:18:52 -0500 Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k15so1283436rvb.23 for ; Sat, 15 Dec 2007 08:18:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=MFIp0/fEAonVzRBkNxEDOXiamA7twqAEbaocnwTEOnk=; b=WgvonOPVV/ulZpkksTfJj1ktScNZyAn7o2WnQwppnawbAmyAqIu4o+l1DXrvXx/0LUuIOiwoo0nGrvwiVumk1I0Mcw+m7Q9KKQWcmeeH8D2hWMdwNm8KuOOhYW43JI6c3Kl0+VG04HnQoK/oyKUl1YdCpRzrW22+bGTySc776MQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=NfMmpDxIJ7EKQ+RtK2ZES1sLQNd7FMeqXYKE6ecq7TclJA0wJx7BPg31mknNY6QE8G4o/HwlGeexCuj67CJwo3juM8Gg6L6DYcHJ1T59ic6QxPmQOSZVhQ21gkj+FKyn2cT3xQF7GEpNkadEJjtVsuQi70jAE8KqSwVfvj/yHo4= Received: by 10.141.185.3 with SMTP id m3mr2772593rvp.133.1197735528740; Sat, 15 Dec 2007 08:18:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.50.16 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Dec 2007 08:18:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <98b8086f0712150818n40056cedyf0aae7a5a08a27b7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 17:18:48 +0100 To: internals@lists.php.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: PATCH: anonymous functions in PHP From: troelskn@gmail.com ("troels knak-nielsen") What was the conclusion on Wez' patch from march [1]? The discussion seemed to steer a bit off, on the discussion of scoping rules, but is there any reason _not_ to implement Wez' patch in HEAD? Even if it doesn't entirely replace create_function, it would be nice to have as a compile-time alternative. [1] http://groups.google.com/group/mailing.www.php-dev/browse_thread/thread/a2c3296dc791369a/075209b288cb28de -- troels