Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:34010
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 72.14.202.182 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=JEQFhe4PfocB9n+PXJQfhGIzLE3Nk3hkgTg7yc+eBnE9Rymh8WryVYvm0HJGsjlAtB3T3dcw3prg8ZtshBhvoLLInt5OPSLB2kxcLyvfpAFtfSqNFNEMED1yKEMw2LefMagHBmLNfnhxSHapyd8XhXo06bbIIWyh6VcJSHEzP8M=
Message-ID: <ab5568160712130726o5b964b3fh2cdf1622d1630d45@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 10:26:55 -0500
To: "Sean Coates" <sean@caedmon.net>
Cc: "Andrew Rose" <rose.andrew@gmail.com>, 
	"internals Mailing List" <internals@lists.php.net>
In-Reply-To: <DD865154-7619-4583-95FA-F1EE10D6A677@caedmon.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <475F1984.603@chiaraquartet.net> <4760227D.9050404@zend.com>
	 <alpine.DEB.0.98.0712130952470.27826@kossu.ez.no>
	 <1197551283.27917.9.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <47613538.1060308@wikimedia.org>
	 <1197553571.27917.12.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <47613EEE.5090305@richgray.com>
	 <f90bafdd0712130656me9f1daah928f064a54bcaa76@mail.gmail.com>
	 <ab5568160712130709sfd9a7eeof7de89875fa24960@mail.gmail.com>
	 <DD865154-7619-4583-95FA-F1EE10D6A677@caedmon.net>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Internals read-only
From: parasane@gmail.com ("Daniel Brown")

On Dec 13, 2007 10:19 AM, Sean Coates <sean@caedmon.net> wrote:
> >    2.) Probably a better idea, just click that DELETE button on any
> > emails you don't feel like reading or responding to.  I find that, in
> > a case study performed by myself just now, it takes me about a
> > half-second to achieve success with this method.
[snip!]
>
> However, because Jani's original post was buried in the middle of YET
> ANOTHER ridiculous debate on the "best" namespace operator, I actually
> had to go back to my trash and dig out the original mail after seeing
> Greg's reply and quoted text. I would never have seen it because I got
> trigger happy because almost all of this thread was absolute junk.

    Yeah, I can empathize with that.  You have a point; I had to do
the same on my end.  Still, even if it's reduced to only current PHP
developers (which I wholeheartedly think is a Bad Idea[TM]), you're
still going to have SNR issues because the developers will still be
going back-and-forth.  It happens an ALL mailing lists --- even the
IETF lists (though there, at least, it's very self-regulated, at least
for now).

-- 
Daniel P. Brown
[Phone Numbers Go Here!]
[They're Hidden From View!]

If at first you don't succeed, stick to what you know best so that you
can make enough money to pay someone else to do it for you.