Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:33796 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 16567 invoked by uid 1010); 6 Dec 2007 11:06:00 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 16551 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2007 11:05:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 6 Dec 2007 11:05:59 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=felho@avalon.aut.bme.hu; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=felho@avalon.aut.bme.hu; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain avalon.aut.bme.hu from 84.2.42.5 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: felho@avalon.aut.bme.hu X-Host-Fingerprint: 84.2.42.5 mail00d.mail.t-online.hu Received: from [84.2.42.5] ([84.2.42.5:63345] helo=mail00d.mail.t-online.hu) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 0A/D1-33463-097D7574 for ; Thu, 06 Dec 2007 06:05:57 -0500 Received: from gergely-hodicskas-computer.local (catv-5984da04.catv.broadband.hu [89.132.218.4]) by mail00d.mail.t-online.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A200ABDD6A for ; Thu, 6 Dec 2007 12:05:41 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4757D783.90705@avalon.aut.bme.hu> Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 12:05:39 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "internals@lists.php.net" References: <4731278C.8020301@chiaraquartet.net> <4731F977.4080502@zend.com> <4753B087.4020206@chiaraquartet.net> <003601c83582$a1b16fc0$e5144f40$@mcnaught@synergy8.com> <4754807B.80408@zend.com> <4754A1EE.1090405@avalon.aut.bme.hu> <47559A4A.70408@zend.com> <58308.81.182.142.127.1196806917.squirrel@avalon.aut.bme.hu> <4755FE85.1040905@zend.com> In-Reply-To: <4755FE85.1040905@zend.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] ignored patches From: felho@avalon.aut.bme.hu (Gergely Hodicska) Hi! > Yes, that's my point - 3X faster include opcode is not 3X faster code. > Of course if you do this opcode a lot of times, it would be somewhat > slower than if you do this opcode just one time. However, the question > is how it would influence the whole application? I didn't say that the code will be 3x faster, the main point is that you can gain considerable performance improvement. Of course this is only one factor of optimization, but not a negligible one. http://www.schlossnagle.org/~george/talks/ZendPerf.pdf > I don't guess. Why guess if I can ask you? Maybe you should presume that the other is not a dummy (of course it could happen :)). (I tried the test more time and I get always this results.) Best Regards, Felhő