Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:33706 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 98398 invoked by uid 1010); 5 Dec 2007 01:30:54 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 98383 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2007 01:30:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 5 Dec 2007 01:30:53 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=malterisio777@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=malterisio777@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.146.180 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: malterisio777@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.146.180 wa-out-1112.google.com Received: from [209.85.146.180] ([209.85.146.180:8936] helo=wa-out-1112.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id DC/D2-10080-C4FF5574 for ; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 20:30:53 -0500 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id l24so6985603waf for ; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 17:30:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=O1Z0s44CgN16tn8iESe/3hbmyXQCPiffCibl4gycrLc=; b=fKBcV7G3IcgRHoE/Qu13R7R8TR2kdowcDNH9RCcspRbshPZEJ0iE5yxCMdteBELOo47GlXwQnvxZ/sNcIU59lv4G36+UaOBgQYNmHc2eHmiRji4IvoysNOKmAnNTYcfGXkSdbgwAtnRuGit4xH5KN/7XTYk3plDbTeCWmaO9OBA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=mw3hxHw+/F06+jcKg33Lwkkby6TiQogBRBTBthAOniyTyUIAxW8gmK1LnfDinJd9e/ssbNmMe/7mjFz3t3xEEPlCITQv3fvC818Py/YXBXGlvBPBP0348DTe7ise3///cdaPDFXnzcQzgOXfWOJy9LqUK613MiThcjxdWpJA50g= Received: by 10.142.246.8 with SMTP id t8mr658030wfh.1196818250104; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 17:30:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.157.9 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Dec 2007 17:30:49 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52dbac0f0712041730m4c076be4m6a6338bd78368cf2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 22:30:50 -0300 To: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <4755E19D.3000601@chiaraquartet.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_17165_24579724.1196818250107" References: <4731278C.8020301@chiaraquartet.net> <475580D5.1010903@chiaraquartet.net> <52dbac0f0712040900o5dc80b26keca60ef841843fd1@mail.gmail.com> <47558C21.7040604@chiaraquartet.net> <52dbac0f0712041013p1fb023cag4f2ba8a2a067a099@mail.gmail.com> <4755A4F3.6020909@chiaraquartet.net> <52dbac0f0712041116h1101d2aub6aaebb3cd9689a2@mail.gmail.com> <20071204145655.57566c7utnkjbr40@technest.org> <52dbac0f0712041239u505537f5j5d4a29be205b3b76@mail.gmail.com> <4755E19D.3000601@chiaraquartet.net> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] ignored patches From: malterisio777@gmail.com ("Martin Alterisio") ------=_Part_17165_24579724.1196818250107 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline 2007/12/4, Gregory Beaver : > > Martin, > > Please stop spreading misinformation. [snip] > At least get your facts straight before posting. > > Greg > Greg, that was uncalled for. Isn't it a fact that the namespace keyword does more than just declare a namespace in your current patch? Isn't it a fact that the behavior of the namespace keyword in that patch can lead to confusion, because the order of statements matter and, after the first namespace, the namespace keyword won't fail even if it's not the first statement. Also, there has been too much ado about the patch, if namespaces should be bracketed or not, if import has scope or not, if imports can be unset or not, etc. The patch itself has changed much in little time. Look at it from the php community perspective: we're getting anxious. With all this much ado, how can you expect me, or anyone, to keep up with the whole thing? Misinformation was never my intention, rather than that, I consider myself misinformed about this whole topic. PS: I'm sorry to post again on this rather closed thread. I got home and when I saw this mail I was quite shocked, as it was and answer I wasn't expecting. I felt compelled to write a response, which I promise will be the last. Greg: you should know when to step back. ------=_Part_17165_24579724.1196818250107--