Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:33651
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 64.233.162.226 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=mniDocxwMlnJov/AP3rcSupc0fxAavhN7op3E7l8cahiOSA+q1uDu/5SJdXDPcVzGhNs+Obv/VKqFGFG3Ibi8a/tys8iSsd1G1o9Czey87ZgEqEKmoX6IECvc1h5BKyD2FwddFYy95G0J2U/3U0DV+hOo8wLgi52tlefmS/OZMY=
Message-ID: <52dbac0f0712040850m2e1a764cgc86f579246728b4f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 13:50:31 -0300
To: "PHP Developers Mailing List" <internals@lists.php.net>
In-Reply-To: <169B5499-3238-4364-823D-97572630E77B@gmx.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_14931_20875782.1196787031150"
References: <4731278C.8020301@chiaraquartet.net>
	 <52dbac0f0712040809v64da917cic9aa803f9800f49b@mail.gmail.com>
	 <169B5499-3238-4364-823D-97572630E77B@gmx.net>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] ignored patches
From: malterisio777@gmail.com ("Martin Alterisio")

------=_Part_14931_20875782.1196787031150
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

2007/12/4, Roman Borschel <r.borschel@gmx.net>:
>
> On Dec 4, 2007, at 5:09 PM, Martin Alterisio wrote:
> > 1) Why is performance relevant to whether namespaces are implemented
> > one per
> > file or many per file?
>
> Because including/requiring 80 files one by one seems to be
> significantly slower than including/requiring just a few files.


Sorry but that still doesn't answer my question. That answer the question of
"why use bundling?".

>
> > 2) I was under the impression namespaces were introduced to improve
> > code
> > maintainability. Was I wrong?
> >
>
> Of course. Such bundling processes usually only take place during an
> automated build process. This is not something thats used for
> development.


I didn't understand. Do you mean that I was wrong? Or that I was right about
namespaces purpose, but that's only needed in development? Therefore,
shouldn't the bundling process remove the need for namespaces (i.e. the
bundling process removes namespaces)?

Aside form that, is it not coherent that a whole namespace conforms one
bundle? Why should namespaces mix?

------=_Part_14931_20875782.1196787031150--