Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:33645
Return-Path: <malterisio777@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 68539 invoked by uid 1010); 4 Dec 2007 16:09:12 -0000
Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net
Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 68523 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2007 16:09:12 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 4 Dec 2007 16:09:12 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=malterisio777@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=malterisio777@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 64.233.162.226 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: malterisio777@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 64.233.162.226 nz-out-0506.google.com  
Received: from [64.233.162.226] ([64.233.162.226:34596] helo=nz-out-0506.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id FF/A6-09439-7AB75574 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 11:09:11 -0500
Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id x7so2231974nzc
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 08:09:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        bh=vvw0AxwiUO+Epdmv5NC7ZCq6TBvRcT7pAkHMD0P1Dz0=;
        b=PU1iP/4TwZSMzklWlCcJpSyUj7wkIPGP4H6ef5PpJJPuOUfGQgpC279oobrxwJePNyPROixvs3p46cRhyy3bPd8bckrfJlxXNH6c1dOWlnQXB1OiaLq1h8x6ySuXRxpq7oAeq7T/AWfcRRCQTZu2k//OQ7Qs+r7mYqDgi69w22w=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=Q9pfjDot62so/0IfpNgRFCEYBY4GX/wNvadHHDBgVKBHPTMef3gHyTrh6V8WAgQHlPt7hdeb7fw39zxhFAltzlxzneVPDkkEbola2MWO5D/7LUORga8VfwUa9BU2MfPJyuhmt9ljQi3Ltm6BrWtfaKCUwBKuvXOYUkHvYsFNUS4=
Received: by 10.142.242.8 with SMTP id p8mr291056wfh.1196784547958;
        Tue, 04 Dec 2007 08:09:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.142.157.9 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Dec 2007 08:09:07 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <52dbac0f0712040809v64da917cic9aa803f9800f49b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 13:09:07 -0300
To: "internals Mailing List" <internals@lists.php.net>
In-Reply-To: <4731278C.8020301@chiaraquartet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_14688_31191740.1196784547934"
References: <4731278C.8020301@chiaraquartet.net>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] ignored patches
From: malterisio777@gmail.com ("Martin Alterisio")

------=_Part_14688_31191740.1196784547934
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Sorry to step in uninvited to this discussion, I have some doubts about all
this, and I'll really appreciate if someone more knowledgeable could
enlighten my ignorance. The doubts I have are as follows:

1) Why is performance relevant to whether namespaces are implemented one per
file or many per file?

2) I was under the impression namespaces were introduced to improve code
maintainability. Was I wrong?

That's all folks.

------=_Part_14688_31191740.1196784547934--