Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:33470 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 54389 invoked by uid 1010); 27 Nov 2007 19:15:44 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 54365 invoked from network); 27 Nov 2007 19:15:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 27 Nov 2007 19:15:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=andy@petdance.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=softfail Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=andy@petdance.com; sender-id=softfail Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain petdance.com from 69.17.117.10 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: andy@petdance.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 69.17.117.10 mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from [69.17.117.10] ([69.17.117.10:43212] helo=mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 72/E4-25304-0DC6C474 for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 14:15:41 -0500 Received: (qmail 25780 invoked from network); 27 Nov 2007 19:15:23 -0000 Received: from rocket.petdance.com (HELO uniqua.petdance.com) ([64.81.227.163]) (envelope-sender ) by mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 27 Nov 2007 19:15:23 -0000 Received: by uniqua.petdance.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 58B7B6ED8003; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 13:15:22 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 13:15:22 -0600 To: Stanislav Malyshev Cc: internals@lists.php.net Message-ID: <20071127191522.GA9061@petdance.com> References: <20071127074757.GA25945@petdance.com> <474BDAF8.6020308@zend.com> <474C6089.105@zend.com> <20071127182545.GA8371@petdance.com> <474C624B.1090007@zend.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <474C624B.1090007@zend.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] Clean up struct initalizations From: andy@petdance.com (Andy Lester) On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 10:30:35AM -0800, Stanislav Malyshev (stas@zend.com) wrote: > No, the compiler makes sure I got them all, and it does it with {0}. I can tell where this is going. I'll back away now. xoa -- Andy Lester => andy@petdance.com => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance