Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:33469 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 47268 invoked by uid 1010); 27 Nov 2007 18:57:37 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 47253 invoked from network); 27 Nov 2007 18:57:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 27 Nov 2007 18:57:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=stas@zend.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=stas@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 212.25.124.162 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: stas@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.25.124.162 mail.zend.com Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1 Received: from [212.25.124.162] ([212.25.124.162:58557] helo=mx1.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 87/C3-25304-F986C474 for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 13:57:36 -0500 Received: from us-ex1.zend.com ([192.168.16.5]) by mx1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 27 Nov 2007 20:57:32 +0200 Received: from [192.168.16.91] ([192.168.16.91]) by us-ex1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:57:29 -0800 Message-ID: <474C6899.50301@zend.com> Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:57:29 -0800 Organization: Zend Technologies User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexey Zakhlestin CC: Marcus Boerger , Andy Lester , internals@lists.php.net References: <20071127074757.GA25945@petdance.com> <474BDAF8.6020308@zend.com> <1683048725.20071127113143@marcus-boerger.de> <474C604A.3020600@zend.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Nov 2007 18:57:29.0336 (UTC) FILETIME=[5BC7B780:01C83127] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] Clean up struct initalizations From: stas@zend.com (Stanislav Malyshev) > you are quoting c99… > and we are still using "c90" mode, as far as I remember I couldn't find any c90 available online for free but anyway that's long-standing practice that all compilers I know follow. gcc's own manual says: -Wmissing-field-initializers Warn if a structure's initializer has some fields missing. For example, the following code would cause such a warning, because x.h is implicitly zero: struct s { int f, g, h; }; struct s x = { 3, 4 }; -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/ (408)253-8829 MSN: stas@zend.com